How is the 100-200 game in Bellagio?

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
10/20 NL you play $1K pots all the time. Pretty much any pot that goes past the flop. But your point is fair, of course. I'm purely speaking from an action-junky perspective. I know there are better games in the casino for me to play from an EV perspective than 1/2 FL.

[/ QUOTE ]

The general factor is 8, not 5. 10/20 NL would be like 80/160 limit. So it is close, but the 100/200 fixed is the bigger game.

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]

The general factor is 8, not 5. 10/20 NL would be like 80/160 limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

o rly? this is way off imo. how did you come up with this?

[hoppscot22]

way off which way pete...

[Ryno]

I use 6 for uncapped and 4 for capped. Based on PT stdev with considerations for fatter tails in NL session distributions over the short-term. Is that closer?

[Victor]

i always thought 5 was a pretty good approx. ie 2-4nl = 10-20 lhe.

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]
I use 6 for uncapped and 4 for capped. Based on PT stdev with considerations for fatter tails in NL session distributions over the short-term. Is that closer?

[/ QUOTE ]

sounds reasonable

[TheWorstPlayer]

So sounds like 50/100 is my game if I want a little fixed limit fun where I at least have a chance of being a breakeven player but also can't find a bankroll for the game in my sofa cushions. Thanks, guys.

[emerson]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

The general factor is 8, not 5. 10/20 NL would be like 80/160 limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

o rly? this is way off imo. how did you come up with this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Both from reading and general observation, although I've played very little NL. In some cases it is a little off. I know the 20/40 fixed games have been bigger games than 2/5 NL games I've been in. But 8 is closer than 5.

What do you think it is?

[hoppscot22]

emerson based on your recent limit posts... i dunno what to think

[BK1248]

i played 5-10 6 max on stars limit, 7 tablin with not much game selection, and I found it tuffer than the 100-200 at Commerce and Bellagio