Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:10 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

Tonight's CNBC segment on online-poker including a discussion with Annie Duke, Mike Sexton, and the PPA guy (Mike Bolacek or something??) is available for viewing on their website.


Annie represents 'the cause' extremely well imo.


http://moneycentral.msn.com/cnbc/tv/...ighlights.aspx


edit - might only be able to view it in internet-explorer. I am unable to see it via firefox.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:29 PM
Keyser. Keyser. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: cr blog!
Posts: 4,870
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

As much as we all hate Annie, she still did a really good job.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:29 PM
Gomez22 Gomez22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,027
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

Thanks for the link, MB. Nice little segment for online poker, but still alot of work to be done.

PS - I like how Sexton "hoped the US gov't would look into regulating and taxing it first" when he was asked if the next step was a court battle/litigation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:36 PM
PA32R PA32R is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

[ QUOTE ]
Tonight's CNBC segment on online-poker including a discussion with Annie Duke, Mike Sexton, and the PPA guy (Mike Bolacek or something??) is available for viewing on their website.


Annie represents 'the cause' extremely well imo.


http://moneycentral.msn.com/cnbc/tv/...ighlights.aspx


edit - might only be able to view it in internet-explorer. I am unable to see it via firefox.

[/ QUOTE ]

That Bolcerek looks like some kind of wierd robot.

As for Annie, well, I'd hit it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:42 PM
5thStreetHog 5thStreetHog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,234
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

[ QUOTE ]
As much as we all hate Annie, she still did a really good job.

[/ QUOTE ]Agreed,the good job part lol,never hated her.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:50 PM
billye billye is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 63
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

Annie Duke was really good. Awesome debate skills!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:53 PM
norsgod norsgod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

To little to late. Where was Mike Sexton and Party Poker six months ago? Maybe we would have had, at least, a debate on the senate floor.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:55 PM
busguy busguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: God\'s Country
Posts: 1,108
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

[ QUOTE ]
Annie Duke was really good. Awesome debate skills!

[/ QUOTE ]

Why is the guy who is leading the fight on Capitol Hill the 3rd best speaker in this group of 3 ?

This guy sucks at public speaking. He seriously needs to recruit someone much quicker on their feet than himself, to be the face for, and speaking on behalf of the PPA.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-13-2006, 09:56 PM
ericicecream ericicecream is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gypsy
Posts: 754
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

[ QUOTE ]
To little to late. Where was Mike Sexton and Party Poker six months ago? Maybe we would have had, at least, a debate on the senate floor.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that helps. Maybe they should just go away and not try?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-13-2006, 10:05 PM
Cair Paravel Cair Paravel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hanging around.
Posts: 1,189
Default Re: CNBC Online-poker segment (x-post)

One problem is that the law says a "game involving chance" not a "game of chance". Big difference there, as clearly chance is involved in poker.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.