|
View Poll Results: What do you think of the game balance? | |||
Heavily favored the Village | 3 | 13.64% | |
Favored the Village | 8 | 36.36% | |
Balanced | 9 | 40.91% | |
Favored the Demons | 2 | 9.09% | |
Heavily favored the Demons | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
rvg,
can you filter for hands played against players with specfied ranges of stats? toast |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
Any UB hands been sent?
|
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
Any UB hands been sent? [/ QUOTE ] I've got loads, just haven't got around to sending them since he's focused on other things atm. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
rvg, can you filter for hands played against players with specfied ranges of stats? toast [/ QUOTE ] That's a great idea... I'm pretty sure I can add this. rvg |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
One more small request. I'm a computer nerd who's constantly [censored] with my operating system, therefor eI need to reinstall pokertracker fairly frequently, and every time I have to email the PT guys to get a new key. If you could do the same kind of system that PAHud uses for registration, that would be awesome.
I seriously can't wait for this, and if you need any Linux guinea pigs, hit me up. |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
I seriously can't wait for this, and if you need any Linux guinea pigs, hit me up. [/ QUOTE ] Me too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
3-bet % stat is giving me wood
|
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
wow cant wait till this comes out [/ QUOTE ] Yep, I'm def purchasing this. Sounds awesome; if it lives up to 50% of it, it'll be worthi t. |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] rvg, can you filter for hands played against players with specfied ranges of stats? toast [/ QUOTE ] That's a great idea... I'm pretty sure I can add this. rvg [/ QUOTE ] Great....I'd keep it simple at first, being able to, for example, filter for hands against players with certain vpips or pfrs...Then later you can add more. Just to give you a further idea of what I'm thinking about -- I'd like to know, for example, how often I take down the pot preflop when I 3-bet from the button against a 30/20 or a 14/5 or a 50/10 who raised UTG. |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Re: New Software: Holdem Manager
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] rvg, can you filter for hands played against players with specfied ranges of stats? toast [/ QUOTE ] That's a great idea... I'm pretty sure I can add this. rvg [/ QUOTE ] Great....I'd keep it simple at first, being able to, for example, filter for hands against players with certain vpips or pfrs...Then later you can add more. Just to give you a further idea of what I'm thinking about -- I'd like to know, for example, how often I take down the pot preflop when I 3-bet from the button against a 30/20 or a 14/5 or a 50/10 who raised UTG. [/ QUOTE ] I'd like to take this a bit further. I'd like to be able to identify the average VPIP/PFR of a certain value, whether for cash games or SNGs. Ex: for all the $27 SNGs, what was the overall average VPIP/PFR - excluding my own of course, as well as the average scores for winning or losing players. If it cannot filter the winners as it lacks the stats, perhaps I could personally select the players (thus more than one), and get their average scores, or at least see them side-by-side. I'd also like to be able to filter blinds levels in groups. Ex: in Stars, there are distinct periods. The first 2 levels, possibly 3, wouldn't be played the same as when the higher levels are reached. Blind defense would change enormously for example. Also, contrary to some sites, the blind structure is such that for a good 3 levels the change is incremental at best (150/200/200+25). I'd like to be able to group these levels to get an average value of my play on them, with the average number of players too. This last is important, or it skews ones read of the data. When I was still getting a handle of the data presented by PokerOffice, I noticed that my VPIP increased significantly from 50/100 to 100/200+25, and interpreted this as meaning I was getting more aggressive in the later levels. Later I realized that on average there were about 3 players less at the later level, so my increased VPIP might not actually be more aggressive, merely a natural adjustment to the number of players at the table, and I might in fact be simply just as aggressive, proportionately, not more so. Sorry for the long-winded post. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Albert |
|
|