|
|
|
|
#2
09-07-2007, 05:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
[ QUOTE ]
KdKx7d8d?? [/ QUOTE ] Isn't Kd Jd Td Kh worse? hurts the back door straights! At work, can't access two dimes ;p 
|
|
#3
09-07-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KdKx7d8d?? [/ QUOTE ] Isn't Kd Jd Td Kh worse? hurts the back door straights! At work, can't access two dimes ;p [/ QUOTE ] Nope, 7d8d makes str8 flushes as well as using up flush outs.
|
|
#4
09-07-2007, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] KdKx7d8d?? [/ QUOTE ] Isn't Kd Jd Td Kh worse? hurts the back door straights! At work, can't access two dimes ;p [/ QUOTE ] Nope, 7d8d makes str8 flushes as well as using up flush outs. [/ QUOTE ] word
|
|
#5
09-07-2007, 05:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: bottom 2 + NFD
Against a set we're really drawing to 1 of 7 effective outs (mediocre draw).. against a tight player a fold is on order, even tho it's tough... bottom 2 here is really an illusion of a stronger hand, but in reality, most often in this spot, it'll only give you little protection, holding 2 of his lock outs...
edit: even tho I think a fold might be correct (this is of course read dependent), I don't think I could do it, except against a total nit...
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
