Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2007, 01:45 AM
BarryLyndon BarryLyndon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,590
Default 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

No reads, blinds 400/800/100

Hero (10,245), CO
Button (33,432)
SB (14,753)
BB (16,432)


Folds to Hero with K9o and ____________:

Easy push?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2007, 02:54 AM
4CardStraight 4CardStraight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 560
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

Negatory. We fold if they are playing well. We push if they are way too tight.

If they are playing well its -EV.

We should get looked up on average by this range:
55+,A6s+,A9o+,KTs+,KJo (14%)

.88X^Y3 = 36% of the time we get looked up
64% we win blinds


Were 31.3% dog when called nets to -1200Tchips
We steal 68% of the time for for +1025Tchips


So its -EV if they average calling us well. If they call us with top 10% or tighter its clearly +cEV. If we give our chips a slight premium they have to be quite tight for it to be +$EV. If we give our chips a significant premium then they need to be redic tight for it to be +$EV.

Its a muck, imho. Here I would be open pushing:

33+,AXs,A7o+,KTs+,KQo (appx)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2007, 09:11 AM
Pokerfarian Pokerfarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 594
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

Is this 4-handed or is it 9ish handed and its folded to CO? I'm guessing its 8/9 handed in which case I think it's a shove (assuming not FT so cEV = $EV) We're picking up 2000/2100 when not called.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2007, 09:59 AM
2Fast 2Fast is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: K-Town NYC
Posts: 1,125
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

[ QUOTE ]
Negatory. We fold if they are playing well. We push if they are way too tight.

If they are playing well its -EV.

We should get looked up on average by this range:
55+,A6s+,A9o+,KTs+,KJo (14%)

.88X^Y3 = 36% of the time we get looked up
64% we win blinds


Were 31.3% dog when called nets to -1200Tchips
We steal 68% of the time for for +1025Tchips


So its -EV if they average calling us well. If they call us with top 10% or tighter its clearly +cEV. If we give our chips a slight premium they have to be quite tight for it to be +$EV. If we give our chips a significant premium then they need to be redic tight for it to be +$EV.

Its a muck, imho. Here I would be open pushing:

33+,AXs,A7o+,KTs+,KQo (appx)

[/ QUOTE ]

Thx. Wow K9o is certainly something I'd deliberate about a lot but i think I push interesting calcs. Is your range at the end a little tight? I mean I think I throw JTs+ and QJs+ in there for sure - wondering what that turns out like.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2007, 10:31 AM
4CardStraight 4CardStraight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 560
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

Oh sure, you can. Its just not +EV to push them and turn them face up. If our opponents can see us push JT, then they should call with every Q,K,and A, and we have 3 people behind. Thats top 45% hands (every pair, A,K,Q) and were 43/57 against that range. Only 16% of the time will we steal the blinds if they call that loose, and the rest of the time were somewhat dominated.

Now... Opponents cant see our cards, and we dont turn them face up, and they are often calling way too tight. If they are calling us ACCURATELY according to our cards, then pushing 12BB from cutoff with JTs is a loser.

The range I gave is a winner no matter how loose they call.

4Card.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2007, 11:50 AM
zoobird zoobird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,045
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

Based on OPs subject line saying 'M=5', I think you're right that this is 8 or 9 handed, in which case the antes make this an instapush.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2007, 12:31 PM
BarryLyndon BarryLyndon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,590
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

Sorry, it was 8 handed and there are 2000 chips in the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2007, 12:35 PM
shaundeeb shaundeeb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Head of Coaching Dept
Posts: 9,667
Default Re: 24: K9o, M of 5, ITM, big stack to left

shove all day fold A2o though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.