|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i might be taking this value thing too far
when the hand occurred, i failed to take notice of stacks and did not shove (like i believe i should have). i posted the hand to get an evaluation of that line, since that is what i believe i should have done against his whole range.
he ended up having an oddly played 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i might be taking this value thing too far
[ QUOTE ]
when the hand occurred, i failed to take notice of stacks and did not shove (like i believe i should have). i posted the hand to get an evaluation of that line, since that is what i believe i should have done against his whole range. he ended up having an oddly played 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Not a bad line for him with that hand. Would you call with TT on the end? But I think its rare he has a smaller flush, and mostly has some crap like a single heart or small pair + heart imo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i might be taking this value thing too far
i dont understand why everyone keeps saying they would just call vs an unknown and might shove w/ a read. Unknown = retard 9/10 and we have the niggity nut flush - R IN.
edit: imo |
|
|