Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-13-2007, 09:52 AM
matt85 matt85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 599
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

I like this a lot.

Pushing turn is probably bad here. If theres one thing that has helped me become a decent SSNL player its realising that people just do not fold big overpairs.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-13-2007, 09:53 AM
Demogorgon Demogorgon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Feed your head
Posts: 166
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

Standard and wp. Goad him into 2/4 or 3/6 HU after this (also standard)
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:01 AM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your initial raise seem a bit over the top with 5-high.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please stop posting.

[/ QUOTE ]
+1
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-13-2007, 10:54 AM
WC3V WC3V is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 87
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

NH.

You know what he has and you know he wont be folding.

Well played
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:47 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]
Fold preflop heads up against a loose passive's LRR. The initial raise was fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

i call these minraises with a wide range.

we have great pot odds
we have position
he has a very narrow range
he will often let us see 5 cards cheaply
he will often let us play a small pot when we are behind and a big pot when we are ahead

this villain actually bet decent amounts in this hand, so credit has to go with him, but in alot of other cases, they trap check the flop, then bet small on other streets for example but will not fold to a massive overbet at any point

like this hand

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (6 handed) Party Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

saw flop|<font color="#C00000">saw showdown</font>

UTG ($262.60)
<font color="#C00000">MP ($276.95)</font>
<font color="#C00000">Hero ($208)</font>
Button ($199)
SB ($614.70)
BB ($200.52)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP calls $2, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $10</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises to $18</font>, Hero calls $8.

Flop: ($39) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($39) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">MP bets $20</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $40</font>, MP calls $20.

River: ($119) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP checks, Hero calls $208 (All-In), MP calls $150.

Final Pot: $419
<font color="#009B00">Main Pot: $419, between MP and Hero.</font> &gt; <font color="#FFFFFF">Pot won by Hero ($419).</font>
<font color="#009B00">Pot 2: $58, returned to MP.</font>

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
MP has Ah Ac (two pair, aces and queens).
Hero has 7c 7s (full house, sevens full of queens).
Outcome: Hero wins $419. MP wins $58. </font>

also note that in this case i made a mistake by only minraising the turn. i did this because at the time i was worried villain may have AK and thought he would call with AK to a minraise but not a proper raise. if i had raised properly on the turn the river shove would not be an overbet.

but it didn't matter in the end.

i think minlimpreraises are the spot where your implied odds are highest.

i think in the OP my closest decision was the flop, the other streets being alot easier
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-13-2007, 11:48 AM
sh58 sh58 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: brighton
Posts: 1,895
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]
Standard and wp. Goad him into 2/4 or 3/6 HU after this (also standard)

[/ QUOTE ]

lol. i am not quite rolled for those games unfortunately
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:15 PM
Chicago Twister Chicago Twister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 546
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]
we have great pot odds irrelevant
we have position true, the one saving grace which makes it not a bad call
he has a very narrow range true
he will often let us see 5 cards cheaply i disagree
he will often let us play a small pot when we are behind and a big pot when we are ahead i disagree

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:34 PM
Alobar Alobar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: spite shoving minraises
Posts: 17,702
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]
all your math is correct but do you always stack the fish if you hit and he doesn't imrpove to a FH ?

[/ QUOTE ]

no, but sometimes on the turn youll pick up some other outs (like here), sometimes hell check and you get a free card, sometimes hell bet too small (cuz thats what fish do), sometimes he doesnt have QQ+ (tho I Guess that can just as easily hurt you as help you). Even if worse case its slightly -EV its not gunna be by a lot. And like someone else in this thread said, whether you call here or not really isnt going to mean much in the long term
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-13-2007, 12:59 PM
aufbruch aufbruch is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 64
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

Pre-flop is fine but you can definitely fold the flop. He didn't have a full stack to start the hand and I'm not into drawing with small flush draws on paired boards. There are times/boards he won't stack off on, times he boats up, times he has AKs and all this is trimming down on your implied odds. Plus he's firing the turn with pretty much the entire range I'd assign to a bad players LRR - normally for a decent size bet.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-13-2007, 01:07 PM
kaby kaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 535
Default Re: i played this perfectly, right?

[ QUOTE ]

i call these minraises with a wide range.

(...)
he has a very narrow range i disagree with this, i've seen min3bets in spots like this with all sorts of crap or small/medium pocket pairs or whatever... don't know if that's good or bad though, i still call
he will often let us see 5 cards cheaply this is correct wtf@ppl saying it isn't ... never seen a fish cbet 10$ in a 40$ pot? :s

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.