#1
|
|||
|
|||
100 NL; AQ in blind battle vs. shortstacked unknown; How\'s This?
6 Max
I've seen villian for 4 hands so no reads and no stats. PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Hero ($105.70) BB ($60.55) UTG ($128.95) MP ($130.90) CO ($112.95) Button ($105.80) Preflop: Hero is SB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $3.5</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $6</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $28</font> (I'm all-in whether he pushes here or I push on flop) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL; AQ in blind battle vs. shortstacked unknown; How\'s This?
I'd just make it $61 pre-flop and get it over with.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL; AQ in blind battle vs. shortstacked unknown; How\'s This?
[ QUOTE ]
I'd just make it $61 pre-flop and get it over with. [/ QUOTE ] agreed |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL; AQ in blind battle vs. shortstacked unknown; How\'s This?
Would you guys still 4 bet if he had a full 100 bb stack or what would be your move then?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL; AQ in blind battle vs. shortstacked unknown; How\'s This?
Read-dependant.
Against a LAG-tard definitely 4-bet. Without reads just calling is fine. |
|
|