I want to see winning players' stats from WPEX. Limit only. (Bots)

[BiCuriousGeorge]

yeah, webster, you are retarded. if you add my rake and my profit from playing, it's about +1700 which is almost exactly how much i am up.

poker tracker should fix that and make it so the rake is accurate.

[Jeffro]

Can somebody please explain to me when the definition of rake changed? I understand all the MGR ,contributed, dealt and the unmentionable has fried everyone’s brain. The rake you pay is the sum of rake taken from the pots you win, end of story.

[MicroBob]

rake-back on WSEX is dealt-hand method (although maybe it changed in the last update for all i know).

rake-back on p-tracker I'm actually not sure as somebody pointed out that I'm wrong about that.
I didn't think it was dealt-hand but I really have never looked at the rake-paid very closely on PT.

[MasterChen]

Then play no-limit. I'll be happy.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think many limit players are winning. If they are, it's not by a good amount. Why? Because I think WPEX has house bots that take some of the money. No, I don't think any other sites are rigged or have house bots. So proove me wrong by showing me winning stats from your poker traker, LIMIT only.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Alobar]

WPX rakes less than party does.

You are convinced its full of bots, tell everyone they are stupid for playing there, yet

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not anti WSEX at all. I play there,

[/ QUOTE ]

uh...whos the idiot?

[stickneymarc]

If you see me at 10/20 tables. I am not a bot. Rake discussion is splitting hairs. Play there enough and get lots of money back. Try to be positive about the site. Hopefully site will stabilize and traffic will increase so I don't have to see the same 30 guys at 10/20 and rake always stays 100% based on some calculation.

[mike l.]

sounds reasonable. so who are the bots? names please.

[stickneymarc]

100/200 yopapaya (only watch this one)
10/20 xyz_zzy (this one short handed on multiple tables is a cylon)

Both just too good to be human.

[DING-DONG YO]

[ QUOTE ]
sounds reasonable. so who are the bots? names please.

[/ QUOTE ]

[Vern]

[ QUOTE ]
100/200 yopapaya (only watch this one)
10/20 xyz_zzy (this one short handed on multiple tables is a cylon)

Both just too good to be human.

[/ QUOTE ]
That makes no sense. I could understand "too endurant", "too consistant", "too standard", or "too plain" but where do you get "good" from? Unless they are marvels of AI, they would play a pretty ABC game. If they were marvels of AI, I doubt WSEX would be the place to deploy them for maximum profit.