Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-28-2007, 10:58 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Winning rivalry games, is it a skill?

http://footballoutsiders.com/index.php?p=5505
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-28-2007, 12:30 PM
HorridSludgyBits HorridSludgyBits is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 108
Default Re: Winning rivalry games, is it a skill?

This is sort of OT, but I think there is a 'big game' mentality that some coaches are better at than others. Since I think everyone will agree that rivalry games fit that category, I'll use it.

Using two pro examples, Schotenheimer and Holmgren are said to have had trouble in playoff games because they get too emotional/high-strung for them, and this nervousness gets passed on to the players. Not everyone will agree with these specific examples, esp. since Holmgren has 2 SB appearances and 1 win, but if you agree that such a concept is valid, then surely there are college counterparts as well?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:18 PM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Looking for law jobs
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: Winning rivalry games, is it a skill?

[ QUOTE ]
This is sort of OT, but I think there is a 'big game' mentality that some coaches are better at than others. Since I think everyone will agree that rivalry games fit that category, I'll use it.

Using two pro examples, Schotenheimer and Holmgren are said to have had trouble in playoff games because they get too emotional/high-strung for them, and this nervousness gets passed on to the players. Not everyone will agree with these specific examples, esp. since Holmgren has 2 SB appearances and 1 win, but if you agree that such a concept is valid, then surely there are college counterparts as well?

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course that's true, but you're basically just asserting that there is a "big game/rivarly mentality" that has a meaningful impact (independent of general ability) on who wins. It MIGHT be possible, but just because people say it all the time doesn't make it so. If anything, I'd say the default would be no meaningful difference unless otherwise proven.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.