Cowboys Vs. Packers

areinitz · #1 11-13-2007, 01:38 PM

To me its pretty obvious the Cowboys are better than the Packers, but i've seen it in both ways in power rankings. Who do you think is the best team in the NFC?

kyro · #2 11-13-2007, 01:41 PM

Stop looking at power rankings that are from Wisconsin.

areinitz · #3 11-13-2007, 01:47 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Stop looking at power rankings that are from Wisconsin.

[/ QUOTE ]

gg sir

Bork · #4 11-13-2007, 01:52 PM

Seahawks obv should be on this poll! Given these two, the Cowboys are much better than the Packers. One team lost to NE and the other to CHI.

areinitz · #5 11-13-2007, 01:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Seahawks obv should be on this poll! Given these two, the Cowboys are much better than the Packers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah and the Packers are obv much better than the seahawks. The top two teams in the NFC are Dallas and Green Bay, and its not close.

Bork · #6 11-13-2007, 02:03 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seahawks obv should be on this poll! Given these two, the Cowboys are much better than the Packers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah and the Packers are obv much better than the seahawks. The top two teams in the NFC are Dallas and Green Bay, and its not close.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Hawks beat this Dallas team last year in the playoffs. (they also beat GB last season) The NFC pretty much sucks and although they are inconsistent SEA would probably beat either Dallas or GB if they played in Qwest. Sadly since they are so inconsistent they are going to end up going to Dallas or GB so they probably won't win, but certainly are talented enough. All that holds them back from an elite record right now is a couple retarded gaffes. I think they have used up their quota for the year. Obv they shouldn't be on the poll though.

Artdogg · #7 11-13-2007, 02:05 PM

Thought you were joking about the Seahawks, they suck. It's Dallas gap GB smaller gap rest

areinitz · #8 11-13-2007, 02:11 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Seahawks obv should be on this poll! Given these two, the Cowboys are much better than the Packers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah and the Packers are obv much better than the seahawks. The top two teams in the NFC are Dallas and Green Bay, and its not close.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Hawks beat this Dallas team last year in the playoffs. (they also beat GB last season) The NFC pretty much sucks and although they are inconsistent SEA would probably beat either Dallas or GB if they played in Qwest. Sadly since they are so inconsistent they are going to end up going to Dallas or GB so they probably won't win, but certainly are talented enough. All that holds them back from an elite record right now is a couple retarded gaffes. I think they have used up their quota for the year.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMG, I just realized the Cowboys beat the undefeated Colts last year! That makes them the superbowl champions right?!!

Last year doesn't matter, and saying that they would probably lose on the road really hurts your arguement, your posting as a fan with a bias opinion

areinitz · #9 11-13-2007, 02:16 PM

Lets break it down:

Dallas QB > Seatle QB
Dallas RBs > Seatle RBs
Dallas WRs > Seatle WRs
Dallas O line > Seatle O line
Dallas Defense > Seatle Defense

Shall we continue?

Bork · #10 11-13-2007, 02:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Lets break it down:

Dallas QB > Seatle QB
Dallas RBs > Seatle RBs
Dallas WRs > Seatle WRs
Dallas O line > Seatle O line
Dallas Defense > Seatle Defense

Shall we continue?

[/ QUOTE ]

Thing is you are wrong about the defense and QB. Which happen to be the 2 most important things on the list. I'm not going to argue the Hawks are better though, just that there are no especially good teams in the NFC, and it's going to be a craps shoot in the playoffs.

View Poll Results: You open raise UTG to $7. It's folded to the button (40/20) who makes it $20 to go. Which hands do
55	8	42.11%
AQo	3	15.79%
AJs	2	10.53%
JTs	4	21.05%
76s	2	10.53%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll