#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wow, lotsa gamboolers. I fold and make a note. [/ QUOTE ] This is like AK always [/ QUOTE ] I admit that I just moved up from 50NL last week, but I've seen this at least 10 times since I arrived in SSNL and it has been a hand that beat 2nd pair only once. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
thats a fold from me,
i like to gamble but not on this side... i better be on the nutdraw then drawing dead |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow, lotsa gamboolers. I fold and make a note. [/ QUOTE ] This is like AK always [/ QUOTE ] I admit that I just moved up from 50NL last week, but I've seen this at least 10 times since I arrived in SSNL and it has been a hand that beat 2nd pair only once. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, nice table selection I guess. Honestly, calling is probably about break-even over time. The problem is how thin you are drawing when you are behind. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
[ QUOTE ]
Hero has invested $3 into this pot with a marginal hands. Hero has to pay $65.50 to find out if his hand is good. Pot size is $7.50 - for all those who call can you see why this is wrong? [/ QUOTE ] Explain why the pot size is $7.50. I count $73. Then explain why the [censored] the fact that "so far you've invested $3" is relevant. Equity is equity, and sunk costs don't matter. You'd make a poor economist. Both monetarily and qualitatively. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow, lotsa gamboolers. I fold and make a note. [/ QUOTE ] This is like AK always [/ QUOTE ] I admit that I just moved up from 50NL last week, but I've seen this at least 10 times since I arrived in SSNL and it has been a hand that beat 2nd pair only once. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, nice table selection I guess. Honestly, calling is probably about break-even over time. The problem is how thin you are drawing when you are behind. [/ QUOTE ] How is that a problem? I call and 5 times out of ten he's drawing to 2 outs, and I have a 2 out redraw. Then 4 more times he's drawing to 7-9 outs. I think that makes up for the one time that I am drawing to 2-3 outs. Oh, and WTF does "nice table selection" mean. How often do you see someone at a bad table (i.e. table full of good players) do this? You're pretending that most players who think rationally shove $65 into $7.50 all the time, and he must have practiced "good table selection" to find the few donks who IRRATIONALLY shove $65 into $7.50. What...the...[censored]...? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
Once again bilbo wins this thread. I actually doctored the HH a little because I snap-called in the real hand...but it got me thinking about wtf I would have done w/ AQ/AJ in this spot.
Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter SB: $92.20 BB: $56 UTG: $68.50 Hero (CO): $352.40 BTN: $127.15 Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (CO) <font color="red">UTG raises to $3</font>, Hero calls $3, 3 folds Flop: ($7.50) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG bets $65.50 and is All-In</font>, Hero calls $65.50 Turn: ($138.50) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 is All-In) River: ($138.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 is All-In) Results: $138.50 Pot ($2 Rake) UTG showed 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (two pair, Sevens and Threes) and LOST (-$68.50 NET) Hero showed A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (two pair, Aces and Threes) and WON $136.50 (+$68 NET) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
this is an instacall. I've seen uberfish take this line so often after a scare card hits.
eg min 3bet preflop w AA then massively overbet the flop (preflop: i have the nuts i need to trap him hohoho; postflop: uh oh) minraise set on a 2 flush board then overbet when the flush hits the horse has long since left the stable little fishies |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wow, lotsa gamboolers. I fold and make a note. [/ QUOTE ] This is like AK always [/ QUOTE ] I admit that I just moved up from 50NL last week, but I've seen this at least 10 times since I arrived in SSNL and it has been a hand that beat 2nd pair only once. [/ QUOTE ] Wow, nice table selection I guess. Honestly, calling is probably about break-even over time. The problem is how thin you are drawing when you are behind. [/ QUOTE ] How is that a problem? I call and 5 times out of ten he's drawing to 2 outs, and I have a 2 out redraw. Then 4 more times he's drawing to 7-9 outs. I think that makes up for the one time that I am drawing to 2-3 outs. Oh, and WTF does "nice table selection" mean. How often do you see someone at a bad table (i.e. table full of good players) do this? You're pretending that most players who think rationally shove $65 into $7.50 all the time, and he must have practiced "good table selection" to find the few donks who IRRATIONALLY shove $65 into $7.50. What...the...[censored]...? [/ QUOTE ] Were you born a d-bag, or do you work at it? Just wondering. This is a draw a whole bunch of the time we aren't crushed. Do the math, idiot. Meanwhile, I am real sick of you. Plonk. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
i'd call this every time
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ummm...wtf? TPGK facing open shove.
this is a line alot of terrible players will take with KK-TT.
oh no, my monster is ruined, i'm closing my eyes and shoving and hoping for the best |
|
|