Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-01-2007, 10:05 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

Sorry for the extra thread, but I plan on shipping this to BFI after we're done with it.

This case is making a lot of people nervous in financial circles to the point that the argument is being made that the issue is too important to be left to the courts (a "political question") and that the Court should stay out of it.

Typically, municipal bonds are not subject to state taxes if a resident buys the bond from his home state, but they are taxed if bonds are from a municipality in another state. The Supreme Court will examine if this violates the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection clause and the Commerce Clause. This case is shaping up to have a huge impact on the $2 trillion dollar municipal bond market.

My take on this is that the Supreme Court will vote to forbid interstate only taxes. Interstate sales taxes have already been ruled a commerce clause violation and the commerce clause has been consistently held to forbid barriers to interstate commerce.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2007, 10:21 PM
lehighguy lehighguy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,290
Default Re: Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

So a New Yorked could buy a NJ bond without tax.

Sounds like a huge win for some municipalities. This might be worth looking at.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2007, 11:13 PM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Billion-dollar CIA Art
Posts: 5,061
Default Re: Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

I agree with iron. I think there are some plausible arguments in favor of taxing bonds this way, but the overall effect has to be to fragment the municipal bond market along state lines, which is exactly what the CC was intended to prevent.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:26 AM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

Bump.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-03-2007, 10:56 AM
Orlando Salazar Orlando Salazar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DUCY
Posts: 1,353
Default Re: Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

Right, but most muni bonds are purchased by investment funds who have already circumvented theses restrictions. You can sign up at Fidelity.com
Not really relevant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-03-2007, 03:56 PM
BigBiceps BigBiceps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,571
Default Re: Municipal bonds SCOTUS case

What are the implications of this for someone who already owns a bunch of municipal bonds in their own state?

Also, what are the implications of the tax exempt free fund families at Vanguard where some states earn slightly lower 0.1 - 0.2 % than others.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.