Is it acceptable to post PMs?

[Gildwulf]

[ QUOTE ]
Apparently you can post PMs.....
evidence

[/ QUOTE ]

posting anonymous ones from trolls are fair game

[pvn]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
In that case PVN, Borodog and NT are my trolls.

[/ QUOTE ]

oh the ironing

i'm pretty sure if both me and pvn disagree with you it's like winning the triple crown of wrong. errm, double crown anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

I count 2x. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Micturition Man]

[ QUOTE ]
yea...the whole 2-7 stuff is beyond me, though that thread wasn't about strategy as much as them going at each other...

[/ QUOTE ]


In the 2-7 thread I just posted ":eyesrolling" because I thought the criticism of TT's posts was so obvious that it was a waste of time to spell it out.

I can't remember his exact post but basically he recommended folding 2w6 (i.e. 236, 246, 256) UTG, *in order to reduce variance*.

In my opinion this is bad advice for any poker variant (folding thinly +EV hands to reduce variance), but especially bad for 2-7, which has a huge variance no matter how you play it. If you really fear variance that much you should simply not play 2-7.

Anyway I wanted to just leave it at that but then he made some bizarre attack, claiming I had made razz games softer which is truly absurd for many reasons, which was so dumb I had to respond.

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
Razz fight and 2-7 fight. Drama gogogogogogogo!!!

[/ QUOTE ]
If THIS is what the threats are about, TT is WAY more out of line than OP, particularly threatening to ban someone for posts in a forum he doesn't even mod. Disagreement is not trolling.

[tuq]

[ QUOTE ]
I can't remember his exact post but basically he recommended folding 2w6 (i.e. 236, 246, 256) UTG, *in order to reduce variance*.

In my opinion this is bad advice for any poker variant (folding thinly +EV hands to reduce variance), but especially bad for 2-7, which has a huge variance no matter how you play it. If you really fear variance that much you should simply not play 2-7.

[/ QUOTE ]
LDO