|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
the proof is in the pudding
my record on twoplustwo, selections vs. spread:
W-Hawaii/Boise W-Louisville/Rutgers L-Missouri/Kansas L-LSU/Ark W-USC/AriSte W-Akron/Miami(OH) W-Nevada/MSte W-Texas/OSU W-Indy/Pats L-USC/Oregon W-Boise/Fresno W-Bears/GB W-Pats/Buffalo L-Indiana/Wisconsin W-OSU/PSU W-Den/Pit W-Fla(halftime)/Kentucky W-Rice/SMiss W-Cal/Oregon 15W/4L it has been stated that a selector cannot hit 60% winners consistently; and most of the serious contributors here insist it is ridiculous to claim otherwise. the truth: i have hit 62% winners on average per football season, and have done so professionally. those who disbelieve the possibility of such things merely limit themselves. -c |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
can i keep the bowl?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
LOL at Pats-Colts. You said you were on the ML, not the points.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
OP are you a clown? You sound like one. Congrats on an amazing performance over such a long period of time. Are you going tout yet and how much can we pay ya for your picks?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
my record on twoplustwo, selections vs. spread: W-Hawaii/Boise W-Louisville/Rutgers L-Missouri/Kansas L-LSU/Ark W-USC/AriSte W-Akron/Miami(OH) W-Nevada/MSte W-Texas/OSU W-Indy/Pats L-USC/Oregon W-Boise/Fresno W-Bears/GB W-Pats/Buffalo L-Indiana/Wisconsin W-OSU/PSU W-Den/Pit W-Fla(halftime)/Kentucky W-Rice/SMiss W-Cal/Oregon 15W/4L it has been stated that a selector cannot hit 60% winners consistently; and most of the serious contributors here insist it is ridiculous to claim otherwise. the truth: i have hit 62% winners on average per football season, and have done so professionally. those who disbelieve the possibility of such things merely limit themselves. -c [/ QUOTE ] Let's make a prop bet. I will lay you 3 to 2 that you can't pick 60 out of 100 winners versus widely available lines. We will have to post the money up before hand of course. If you pick anywhere close to 62%, this is a huge edge for you. I will lay up to $15K to win $10K. Accepting this bet will go a long way towards proving your sincerity. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] my record on twoplustwo, selections vs. spread: W-Hawaii/Boise W-Louisville/Rutgers L-Missouri/Kansas L-LSU/Ark W-USC/AriSte W-Akron/Miami(OH) W-Nevada/MSte W-Texas/OSU W-Indy/Pats L-USC/Oregon W-Boise/Fresno W-Bears/GB W-Pats/Buffalo L-Indiana/Wisconsin W-OSU/PSU W-Den/Pit W-Fla(halftime)/Kentucky W-Rice/SMiss W-Cal/Oregon 15W/4L it has been stated that a selector cannot hit 60% winners consistently; and most of the serious contributors here insist it is ridiculous to claim otherwise. the truth: i have hit 62% winners on average per football season, and have done so professionally. those who disbelieve the possibility of such things merely limit themselves. -c [/ QUOTE ] Let's make a prop bet. I will lay you 3 to 2 that you can't pick 60 out of 100 winners versus widely available lines. We will have to post the money up before hand of course. If you pick anywhere close to 62%, this is a huge edge for you. I will lay up to $15K to win $10K. Accepting this bet will go a long way towards proving your sincerity. [/ QUOTE ] I'd probably like some action along these lines as well. I don't see how tlt can refuse - for someone with a long-term track record of 62% winners, to turn this down would be hating money. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
my two cents:
anyone who would think to post something like this prob just had a bad week and needs to be comforted. there is NO way this guy bets more than a few hundred a game since anyone who has graduated to more serious betting knows what the expected win % is and doesnt feel the need to make silly brag posts. I along with anyone here should be willing to take post oak's offer (though obv not at those stakes) for the simple reason that with no real time limit one can simply wait for the most high conviction ideas. I believe that ppl avging 55% can easily move up to 60% with sig patience. The real issue is that no one wants to have 2 bets on a week for a year. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
the proof of the pudding is the eating
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the proof is in the pudding
i just ate some pudding
that being said i'll lay 3:2 as well for $5k if you want more action. |
|
|