|
|
#11
10-10-2007, 03:37 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL $200, interesting hand vs aggressive villain
i would assume this is a draw the majority of the time especially with u holding an 8
|
|
#13
10-10-2007, 04:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL $200, interesting hand vs aggressive villain
[ QUOTE ]
Have you been raising flops a lot? Have you been checking behind a lot? I think these are pretty important questions. [/ QUOTE ] Not raising a lot of flops... Checking/leading about 40/60
|
|
#14
10-10-2007, 05:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL $200, interesting hand vs aggressive villain
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Have you been raising flops a lot? Have you been checking behind a lot? I think these are pretty important questions. [/ QUOTE ] Not raising a lot of flops... Checking/leading about 40/60 [/ QUOTE ] Hmmm....unfortunately that doesn't help too much. I suppose hes unlikely to check a solid hand here if you are also checking behind a significant amount of the time. However, he could definitely b3b a draw here too. Sorry not much help [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
|
#15
10-10-2007, 05:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL $200, interesting hand vs aggressive villain
arent we behind just about all of villain's range? even when we arent crushed we are not in the greatest of shape unless he is holding like 45ss
|
|
#16
10-10-2007, 05:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL $200, interesting hand vs aggressive villain
Depends how often he donkbets and how wide your raising range on the flop is/how often you've been raising him etc etc.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
