6 Teams to not make the playoffs- OFFICIAL THREAD - Page 5

NajdorfDefense · #41 10-07-2007, 05:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Well, I correctly thought GB would be better than last year, and Minny would still have a very good D, was incorrect in thinking Bears would not totally suck. Teams will adjust to DET and Chi will improve at some point.

But, if PHL can score 56 on them, other teams can score on them. And I still think Martz will get Kitna killed back there, see Green, Trent and Warner, Kurt for details. Just a question of when.

edit: note DET should be +35 v Was.

[/ QUOTE ]

Assani Fisher · #42 10-07-2007, 06:51 PM

Ladies and gentlemen, say hello to your first place Oakland Raiders.

Oakland 2-2
Denver 2-3
SD 2-3
KC 2-3

Oakland at SD next week is going to be HUGE for our bet. And the week after that its KC at Oakland.

Denver plays Pit and GB during those weeks...very possible they fall to 2-5 and if Oakland wins those two games they have a commanding lead of the division.

MacGuyV · #43 10-07-2007, 06:56 PM

Yah the Lions stink. Their only decent performance so far was opening day @Oakland. Narrow home wins vs. the Vikings & Bears 2nd string defense is not an impressive 3-1 or 3-2. They look like a 6-10 team.

NajdorfDefense · #44 10-07-2007, 07:35 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Yah the Lions stink. Their only decent performance so far was opening day @Oakland. Narrow home wins vs. the Vikings & Bears 2nd string defense is not an impressive 3-1 or 3-2. They look like a 6-10 team.

[/ QUOTE ]

That would be awesome as I have a vig-free middle on them at 6/6.5.

DannyOcean_ · #45 10-14-2007, 02:44 PM

Just an obsevation early on sunday...

oakland is 2-2 and in first place. houston is 3-2 and in last place in the division. does this mean anything significant? i dunno.

Assani Fisher · #46 10-17-2007, 03:48 PM

Really bad week for me there. Cleveland my only bright spot there. Really big loss by Oakland with SD looking so strong all of a sudden. Also Jacksonville being so good may spell doom for Tenn and Hous.

coolmoedee · #47 10-17-2007, 04:19 PM

This seemed like such an easy bet to pick 6 teams that don't make the playoffs. If I knew OP at all I would have made a nice little bet....My orginial post before the season started picked all these teams not to make it.
Clev.
Wash.
Minny.
Miami.
Gbay.
KC.
Oak.
Texans.
Det.
Atl.
Tbay.

To me all these teams are likely not to make it except for maybe GBay but even they will faulter im sure....why didn't I bet!!!

NajdorfDefense · #48 10-17-2007, 04:33 PM

KC, Tampa and GB are all in first, WAS has winning record in weak NFC. And they will all falter? What??

You have Min, Det, GB, TB, Was all out of playoffs. So, NFC will be: Dal, NYG, Chi, Sea and what 2 others???

coolmoedee · #49 10-17-2007, 05:36 PM

[ QUOTE ]
KC, Tampa and GB are all in first, WAS has winning record in weak NFC. And they will all falter? What??

You have Min, Det, GB, TB, Was all out of playoffs. So, NFC will be: Dal, NYG, Chi, Sea and what 2 others???

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, Dallas and Seattle should be in for sure. I was thinking AZ will get one wildcard but they have QB troubles and so does SF. I think the Bears will still win their Division but of course GB would be the fav right now. Saints are on the March to win their division but I could only see Carolina beating them out so give Caroline the wildcard.
Dalls
Seattle
Carolina
Saints
AZ or NYG
Bears
those are the 6 that should make the playoffs in the NFC.

I think the AFC is blatently obvious to me

NE
Indy
SD
Pitts
Jax
Baltimore

Nuff said.

insanity31 · #50 10-17-2007, 05:55 PM

[ QUOTE ]

Well, Dallas and Seattle should be in for sure. I was thinking AZ will get one wildcard but they have QB troubles and so does SF. I think the Bears will still win their Division but of course GB would be the fav right now. Saints are on the March to win their division but I could only see Carolina beating them out so give Caroline the wildcard.

[/ QUOTE ]

R U SERIOUS?