Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-10-2007, 04:52 AM
TheJokerIsWild TheJokerIsWild is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 749
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

NH
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:09 AM
wdead wdead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

[ QUOTE ]
would be eaiser to felt if you didint 3b so much pf

[/ QUOTE ]

what???? this hand is standard.
from a game theory/balance standpoint you can NEVER b/f this hand. Also your flop bet is fine, since you will be firing air here alot, you gotta fire good hands too.

Now if you dont care about balancing and want to be super easy to play against, just check here always, you gain a little when villain bluffs, but you lose ALOT of bluffing equity later against observant regs.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:11 AM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

when did i say it wasnt? just said id be happier felting if the pfr wasnt so big.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:20 AM
wdead wdead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

[ QUOTE ]
when did i say it wasnt? just said id be happier felting if the pfr wasnt so big.

[/ QUOTE ]

the more you put in pre the more tied you are to the pot postflop. say you rr to 75 preflop and this is the flop, you are never folding. say you minraised pre and this is the flop, stacking could be bad. thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:27 AM
Unknown Soldier Unknown Soldier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,587
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

i just think raising to 34 narrows his range pf, a normal raise to 24-28 makes it wider by a decent amount, although if thats his std raise size then perhaps not.


i get what you are saying, depending on a few things the pot size wont differ by a great amount if he raised slightly less, but ranges change more (less likely to mess around with junk). Whereas if he min-raised pot size would be considerably smaller and ranges considerably larger making it a completely different scenario.

Kinda jumbled, i suck at explaing stuff :/
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:30 AM
Syntec87 Syntec87 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 361
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

bet / 3bet AI this board all day, yeah the Q sucks, if he won AQ vs AK fine it sucks move on, if you two are tangling and 3betting even semi light AJ/ATs are possible as well as broadway or even lower flush draws...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:37 AM
orange orange is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: University of NE Lincoln/Omaha
Posts: 19,438
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

yeah i agree with US, i dont like pfrr sizing either. its like you're super scared to play oop or something (is what i get from that bet sizing, not saying you are).
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-10-2007, 05:45 AM
shpanko shpanko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mile High Club
Posts: 4,726
Default Re: TPTK, RR\'ed pot semi-deep against solid reg

Villain had ATs, I don't really like his play. And yeah this deep this is my standard 3-bet size
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.