Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-18-2007, 09:11 AM
I-Love-Poker I-Love-Poker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: I Just Love Poker
Posts: 120
Default Re: Bay Area(ish) Casinos

[ QUOTE ]
i played cache creek once. its a very nice casino for the area. They had a few tables of low fixed limit 2/4 or 3/6 and some 2/4 NL 100-200 buy in that was donktastic. i was there on a thursday afternoon.. there were 2 tables of NL on probably four of the limit which i wasn't paying much attention to. a very nice poker room with some good gimmicks (aces cracked, etc). but the casino itself is very nice

[/ QUOTE ]

really?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2007, 01:18 PM
TakenItEasy TakenItEasy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 638
Default Re: Bay Area(ish) Casinos

If you don't mind a bit of a drive try Napa Valley Casino. It's tiny but friendly. They have a $1/$3 NL no cap. The best thing is that they charge time $6/half hour. Works out much cheaper than most Bay Area rakes. They also have a hotel discount worked out across the street.

Another small casino is American Canyon Casino. I think it's $2/$2/$3 with a $4 rake $300 cap? Been awhile so not sure of the details.

Lucky Chances is probably your best bet. The $1/$1/$2 is pretty close to what you want. More of a casino atmosphere. I think the cap was $200. An oddity with Lucky Chances is that they make you limp for double the big blind. As a result you can think of the blinds as half size, probably zero after the rake, so raising in EP doesn't make much sense. This seems to encourage a lot of limped pots. They also have a $2/$3/$5 $500 cap I think.

Bay101 and Garden City have spread limit where the betting is also capped

Garden City:
$1/$1/$2 $2-$100 $100 cap
$1/$3/$5 $5-$200 $200 cap

Bay101:
$2/$3/$5 $5-$100 $100 cap
$5/$5/$10 $10-$200 $1,000 cap

The spread limit plays a lot like NL unless it's a raised multiway pot. Then it plays more like a large limit game after the flop. Implied odds may be limited below what you normally expect in NL so Daniel Negreanu would probably hate it. Hard to justify playing the T7o against a tight EP raiser.

Sorry if I got some of the details wrong. It's been a while since I played at some of the lower limits.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.