100k 100nl review

[Dire]

WWSF is very low, VPIP to PFR ratio sucks, steal frequency is too low, etc.. Not like it matters. OP's not brain dead. He obviously knows he's playing weak tight, and knows that is what everybody would point out. But posted this anways. 5BB/100 at $100 when you're managing 27+ WTSD and nearly 54% W$SD is seriously not a brag.

[gball]

He said he has played 30k hands nl200 already. Seems like W$WSF is the new ptBB/100. If you 10 table like the MT ratio implies, then the W$WSF will surely be lower than if you 4 tabled, you just simply don't have enough time to fight over every small pot.

[Slider]

I made that whole post about W$WSF awhile ago... but if you're winning - you are doing something right.

W$WSF is a good tool to look at if you're losing as one of the many possible leaks. If it's low and you're losing - you could use it to correlate with the amount your calling oop. It could be lower because you're calling too much oop or too much in position with speculative hands and not playing them properly.

[tubasteve]

running good IMO based on those super passive stats, or maybe you just table select really good, and never tilt. either way this is def a brag.

[zuutroy]

1st post! All looks fine to me. People get so hung up on things like W$WSF and WTSD as if they're the defining factor in whether you're a winner or not. Those stats gloss over so much. If your W$WSF flop is 'low' (btw I dont think 37% is low) you could still be very profitable, by losing small pots the 63% of the time you lose, but winning big ones when you win.
All this obsession with stats that track individual hands regardless of the pot size flies in the face of one of the most important rules of poker: We are trying to win money, not pots.

[sh58]

you mostly have the leaks most multitabling regs have. i think things like w$wsf and AF lower the more tables you play.

this is imo a very very good winrate for someone playing 10 tables.

by all means continue playing like this, but just be aware that you will have to change styles to beat midstakes for the same whack.

this may help

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post13026431

[harangutang]

From limited experience, I would totally agree with sh58. Cbet more flops and you should pick up more pots.

[Ranger_Trivette]

[ QUOTE ]
running good IMO based on those super passive stats, or maybe you just table select really good, and never tilt. either way this is def a brag.

[/ QUOTE ]

his aggression is somewhat similar to mine, I think that I am way too passive in some spots. What are somewhat good numbers for postflop aggression?

[fees]

too tight/passive for my taste

[keikiwai]

move up already

also, you're not aggressive enough in the pots you enter

you can see this from your W$WSF and your street by street agg

also, work on stealing more / opening up more in late position