Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:47 PM
kleath kleath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: /\\ lean wit it rock wit it/\\
Posts: 1,800
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

Joe gets mad when he busts on the bubble I think and just berates randomly, it may not be the best option but in the play itself its not -$ev
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:49 PM
kleath kleath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: /\\ lean wit it rock wit it/\\
Posts: 1,800
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

Also AMT we fare better against a slightly tighter range than ATC
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:52 PM
Tantalus747 Tantalus747 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 90
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]


If hes on any 2, its barely +EV (+0.1)....since bigjoe is known to spite call anyways, I'd probably have just typed in "my bubble!!!!" if i had made the call.


[/ QUOTE ]

I think bigjoe's pushing slightly less than 100% here. I've seen in his vids him folding things like 25o while explaining that if it was suited it'd be good enough. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:55 PM
microbet microbet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: fighting the power
Posts: 7,668
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]
the idea is that, as kevin touched on, its much better to shove when you know he cant call than call off with such close stacks and such a dominating position when hes already shoved.

If hes on any 2, its barely +EV (+0.1)....since bigjoe is known to spite call anyways, I'd probably have just typed in "my bubble!!!!" if i had made the call.

fact is, even if the shorty is calling kinda loose and you calling with as wide as JJ+, AK, he should still be pushing like 90% of his hands, so its almost always going to be +EV or him to be shoving more or less ATC. it sucks but you just cant really call, he got to act before you....such is life.

[/ QUOTE ]

?

NE calculator shows BJ should shove 100% and BB should call 4.7%, including AKo.

If either BJ doesn't push enough, or perhaps he is pushing correctly because he's correctly assuming people are calling too much (may or may not be true), then it would be a bad call. If everyone is playing correctly, or if BJ is playing correctly and correctly reading people for folding too much, then it's a good call.

edit: RE AKo vs narrower range - yeah, it may be a good call even if BJ thinks people call a little too much.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:55 PM
AMT AMT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Watching my baby grinders take your lunch money
Posts: 9,771
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]
Also AMT we fare better against a slightly tighter range than ATC

[/ QUOTE ]


you're right, but it looks like the EV difference from when hes pushing ATC vs 90% vs 85% is like within 1 and 2 cents of each other. I'm not good enough to narrow it that much [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:55 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

Fold AK.
Snap call T9s and type "my bubble" into chat.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-14-2007, 08:56 PM
rakemeplz rakemeplz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: +ev grimmstar bux vs everyone
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]
Also AMT we fare better against a slightly tighter range than ATC

[/ QUOTE ]

Good to know, I was thinking the other way.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-14-2007, 09:01 PM
rakemeplz rakemeplz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: +ev grimmstar bux vs everyone
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]
Nash doesn't apply here. That's for HU.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was going by the holdemresources nash icm calculator, which says its a +ev. I'd guess he's probably pushing wider I think 85-90% is a good figure like you said, which I figured would make it an easier call, but maybe its about the same.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-14-2007, 09:01 PM
kleath kleath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: /\\ lean wit it rock wit it/\\
Posts: 1,800
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also AMT we fare better against a slightly tighter range than ATC

[/ QUOTE ]


you're right, but it looks like the EV difference from when hes pushing ATC vs 90% vs 85% is like within 1 and 2 cents of each other. I'm not good enough to narrow it that much [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats because you arent bigjoe lol

Imo this is probably a fold even considering meta, especially when the 2 shorties are close in chips AND they play too passive here, meaning you and joe are often just gonna trade off taking pots until one picks up a hand or gets pissed, I really doubt its a $100 mistake though.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-14-2007, 09:03 PM
Ditch Digger Ditch Digger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TBD
Posts: 1,880
Default Re: Big call vs bigjoe2003, how bad is this really?

If he was in the SB I'd snap call because you'll be subject to him pushing relentlessly the next few hands. Since you are on his right you'll be able to shove in front of him on the next 3 hands.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.