#1
|
|||
|
|||
25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
Villain is a predictable, solid 20/15 and on the passive side postflop. He's increased his stealing because the people to my left are really, really tight, and I've been playing tight as well because there was a donk that just busted. I've 3-bet about 3 or 4 times in the past hour at the table, but none of them against him and I won all my 3-bet pots.
Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LegoPoker Hand History Converter Hero (BTN): $37 SB: $48.20 BB: $14.15 UTG: $25.80 CO: $36 Pre-Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN) UTG folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $1</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $4</font>, 2 folds, CO calls $3 Flop: ($8.35) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $5.50</font>, CO calls $5.50 Turn: ($19.35) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $13</font>, CO folds Results: $19.35 Pot ($0.90 Rake) Hero mucked 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and WON $18.45 (+$8.95 NET) In retrospect, I should've near-potted the turn. Everything else standard? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
Why do you think you should have potted the turn?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
raise more on that flop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
Is this a brag, a beat, or what?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
Why did you pick this hand to 3 bet with?
Turn should be a little bigger, but overall its fine. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
I figured I was going to take it down PF enough to make it profitable with ATC considering he'd been stealing quite a lot recently. This is the first time I've 3-bet with nonsuited semiconnectors ever, really, and I was checking to see if it was okay. I wouldn't have thought twice about 3-betting 86s but 86o didn't seem that much worse considering I figured villain to fold at least 75% of his range.
Members_only, I think betting turn larger is necessary because I'm saying the very bottom of my range is AQ and it's a 3-flush board, not to mention a larger bet increases my fold equity a bunch. After I make that bet on the turn it's pretty much all going in regardless if he raises me, so I might as well bet more. Corsakh, I just wanted to see if this was a good way to exploit predictable TAGs and served as a line check for big pots after I've 3-bet light. It definitely wasn't meant as a brag post. Wems, could you explain to me why you would raise more on that flop? ~3/4 pot seems standard to me on a flop that dry. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
With regard to flop bet.. IMO.
If you have JJ+ (which you are repping here), you are probably going to be a little more concerned about people drawing to the flush considering your hand. If I had a set/2p/overpair here I'm likely to drop ~80% pot on the flop. Lots of other people at this level do the same but bet slightly less on a draw / bluff (I assume). So... if you had a made hand you may feel you need to bet more on this flop to protect against the draw. When I see people betting around 1/2 - 7/10 pot on a board like this, I bump with a reasonable hand. If you play every good hand / draw / bluff with this sized bet than fine. Just IMO anyway. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
For reference, that flop bet is around 65% ~ if I were bluffing I may make it 7ish.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
Thanks, my c-bet bluffs and valuebets tend to range from 2/3s to 3/4s pot unless the board is disgustingly wet as a standard, considering I 3-bet relatively frequently without the goods. I bet the same with AK and AA on that board, considering he only has AKcc, AQcc, and KQcc as reasonable drawing hands (which occasionally check-raise me and are a very small part of his range of 88+, AJ+). I've never looked on that as a leak before and raising every 2-flush board to over 3/4 pot seems expensive when a slightly over half-pot raise usually does just fine.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 25 NL: 3-bet pot with 68o against decent reg
I think you played this perfectly. I wouldn't bet more on the flop/turn. c-bets should be 1/2 to 2/3 pot in 3-bet pots, so this looks good.
|
|
|