|
|
#11
09-12-2007, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why are we not mentioning the post flop agressiveness
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think this would stand in NL as well...I have no idea. However, in the limit world, the meaing of the AF would vary based on the VPIP. For example: A VPIP of 15 with an AF of 1 is pretty passive postflop. A VPIP of 70 with an AF of 1 is quite aggressive postflop. So, making a list like that wouldn't necessarily hold fast with every player. [/ QUOTE ] That's quite true QTIP. Maybe we could come up with a formual that takes VPIP% into account. [/ QUOTE ] shouldn't you compare the Saw flop% with the VPIP% then also? 
|
|
#12
09-12-2007, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why are we not mentioning the post flop agressiveness
[ QUOTE ]
shouldn't you compare the Saw flop% with the VPIP% then also? [/ QUOTE ] I am not quite sure, but VPIP% is like SawFlop% minus free play in BB, isnīt it?
|
|
#13
09-12-2007, 03:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why are we not mentioning the post flop agressiveness
[ QUOTE ]
We do use postflop agression factor. It is typically the third number in the x/y/z format. [/ QUOTE ] And typically the total aggression factor, "z," does not include preflop hands. There is a checkbox in Poker Tracker to exclude preflop hands in the calculation of total aggression factor.
|
|
#14
09-12-2007, 04:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why are we not mentioning the post flop agressiveness
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] shouldn't you compare the Saw flop% with the VPIP% then also? [/ QUOTE ] I am not quite sure, but VPIP% is like SawFlop% minus free play in BB, isnīt it? [/ QUOTE ] No VPIP% is every time you puy money in the pot preflop. Saw flop% is how many times you actually see a flop.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
