Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-08-2007, 12:49 AM
andyfox andyfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La-la land, where else?
Posts: 17,636
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

Are you saying that there has not been another attack because of Bush's vigilance and in spite of liberals' trying to put him in handcuffs?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-08-2007, 12:55 AM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
Are you saying that there has not been another attack because of Bush's vigilance and in spite of liberals' trying to put him in handcuffs?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I wouldnt give full credit to GWB, just as I wouldn't give full blame to BJC for 9/11. Without the administration's efforts (e.g. continuing to treat terrorism as a criminal problem) there certainly would have been more on our shores, though. I doubt that any of the major plots that have been thwarted would have been under a Janet Reno justice department.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-08-2007, 01:01 AM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

<font color="red"> Maybe he doesnt give Bush full blame because the prior administration had 8 years to prepare for the attack, and Bush's had 8 months working under restrictions that the prior administration put on our own intelligence? </font>

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, like the restrictions that led to the FBI being alerted about Arabs who wanted to learn to fly jumbo jets but didn't care about landing them?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, restrictions that might have led to the FBI only being alerted 2 months before the hijackings, and which they had begun to act on. And restrictions that might have expedited the alerting of other relevant agencies and acting upon the information.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-08-2007, 02:31 AM
CaptainFreedom CaptainFreedom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 113
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

Ah more droppings from General William the Bloody. I've never seen a greater coward more willing to put others in harm's way. Oh wait I have I forgot about his father.

As much as Kristol wants people to forget about the bungling of Katrina, the pointless and bloody war in Iraq, and the decrease of stature and influence the US has, history will not.

I can't believe how far the US has fallen in the eyes of the world. Check out this pew research:

"A 47-nation survey finds global public opinion increasingly wary of the world's dominant nations and disapproving of their leaders. Anti-Americanism is extensive, as it has been for the past five years....."

"Global distrust of American leadership is reflected in increasing disapproval of the cornerstones of U.S. foreign policy. Not only is there worldwide support for a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, but there also is considerable opposition to U.S. and NATO operations in Afghanistan. Western European publics are at best divided about keeping troops there."


The only person blaming Clinton for Bin Laden has already been proven to be loose with the facts/distortions more than once on these boards. I keep forgetting who was President when the Presidential Daily Briefing with the title " Bin Laden determined to strike in US " was issued on August 6, 2001. Could someone refresh my memory?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-08-2007, 02:57 PM
pokerbobo pokerbobo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Takin a log to the beaver
Posts: 1,318
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]

The only person blaming Clinton for Bin Laden has already been proven to be loose with the facts/distortions more than once on these boards. I keep forgetting who was President when the Presidential Daily Briefing with the title " Bin Laden determined to strike in US " was issued on August 6, 2001. Could someone refresh my memory?

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps we would have already had Bin Laden the Clinton admin would have given the word to take him out when we had him in our sites.... But Slick Willie was a "the buck stops down the hall" type of guy as evidenced by how Janet Reno was hung out to dry after Waco.... and nobody wanted the responsability if something went wrong in the attack.

Clinton claims he knew what a bad guy Bin Laden was, yet when offered him by another govt, Billy says no thanks.

Absolutly Billy was a great anti terrorist president... that is if you dont count the 1st WTC bombing, the emabassy bombings in Africa, the Uss Cole bombing.... oh wait, maybe he wasnt all that great.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-08-2007, 03:14 PM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
I meant to post this a while ago. Anyway, this is one of the most delusional pieces of garbage I have ever read. How does anyone take this guy seriously?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like the average Lincoln supporter to me.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-08-2007, 04:39 PM
MrMon MrMon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Fighting Mediocrity Everywhere
Posts: 3,334
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

The only person blaming Clinton for Bin Laden has already been proven to be loose with the facts/distortions more than once on these boards. I keep forgetting who was President when the Presidential Daily Briefing with the title " Bin Laden determined to strike in US " was issued on August 6, 2001. Could someone refresh my memory?

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps we would have already had Bin Laden the Clinton admin would have given the word to take him out when we had him in our sites.... But Slick Willie was a "the buck stops down the hall" type of guy as evidenced by how Janet Reno was hung out to dry after Waco.... and nobody wanted the responsability if something went wrong in the attack.

Clinton claims he knew what a bad guy Bin Laden was, yet when offered him by another govt, Billy says no thanks.

Absolutly Billy was a great anti terrorist president... that is if you dont count the 1st WTC bombing, the emabassy bombings in Africa, the Uss Cole bombing.... oh wait, maybe he wasnt all that great.

[/ QUOTE ]

I still want to know what was in the documents Sandy Berger managed to destroy out of what he stole from the National Archives.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-08-2007, 04:41 PM
VarlosZ VarlosZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,694
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I meant to post this a while ago. Anyway, this is one of the most delusional pieces of garbage I have ever read. How does anyone take this guy seriously?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds like the average Lincoln supporter to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's gotta be the Non Sequitor of the Week in the Politics forum. Which is really saying something.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-08-2007, 05:46 PM
SNOWBALL SNOWBALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the citizens kneel 4 sex
Posts: 7,795
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]

Clinton claims he knew what a bad guy Bin Laden was, yet when offered him by another govt, Billy says no thanks.


[/ QUOTE ]

link?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-08-2007, 06:07 PM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: Did you see this Bill Kristol column a couple of weeks ago

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Clinton claims he knew what a bad guy Bin Laden was, yet when offered him by another govt, Billy says no thanks.


[/ QUOTE ]

link?

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL. just being the usual obstinate snowman? You must have seen/read this 100 times

whats left out is the added fact that by 1995 the Clinton administration knew of OBLs links to the first WTC bombings. The Afghan offer was in 1996.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.