|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
7 | 16.28% |
| No |
  
|
14 | 32.56% |
| No, but my significant other does |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| No, but I'd consider it |
  
|
4 | 9.30% |
| Tanning is gay, dude |
  
|
18 | 41.86% |
| Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2007, 05:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
ENOUGH about rakes and antes. More imagination please.
Voice off more about changing to hand-based over time-based. And did any of you even read the comment about new payout structures (in addition to the old ones): i.e. 2.20 buyin, 6-5-4-3-2 payout. I repeat, NO MORE posts about rakes and antes. 
|
|
#3
11-26-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
i havent read responses but i am shocked that good players want to get rid of the ante. if anything make them start either and make them bigger.
|
|
#4
11-26-2007, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Keep antes, lower rake.
The 5 payouts for 10 players suggestion is gross. I like the hand based blind levels much better. Stallers are bad for the game. Edit- Oh, and plz put SOMETHING between 100/200 25 and 200/400. 150/300 25 would be splendid
|
|
#5
11-26-2007, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
ENOUGH about rakes and antes. More imagination please. Voice off more about changing to hand-based over time-based. And did any of you even read the comment about new payout structures (in addition to the old ones): i.e. 2.20 buyin, 6-5-4-3-2 payout. I repeat, NO MORE posts about rakes and antes. [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't telling people what to complain about and what not to complain about kind of defeat the purpose of a feedback thread? It is pretty obvious that rake is probably the biggest issue concerning the long-term viability of the high-stakes sngs. Another thing that would happen with lower rake is that if more pros are regularly filling up the higher sngs is that more random fish will want to play them too since they fill up fast. The random high roller who is steaming doesn't want to sign up for a 2k right now because, guess what, they never go!
|
|
#6
11-26-2007, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Im not saying replace the normal SNG structure. I'm merely saying that, PokerSTars, being as big as it is, should give players more options. 6-5-4-3-2 is just another option (one I personally like, and many others do as well. good for beginners. brings in more players.)
|
|
#8
11-26-2007, 06:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
bodog payout is a TERRIBLE idea, please stop posting stupid things, I repeat STOP POSTING. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#9
11-26-2007, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Playing right now, so this will be a short post.
Why on earth would you want to remove antes? I think that's a horrible idea.
|
|
#10
11-26-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
ENOUGH about rakes and antes. More imagination please. Voice off more about changing to hand-based over time-based. And did any of you even read the comment about new payout structures (in addition to the old ones): i.e. 2.20 buyin, 6-5-4-3-2 payout. I repeat, NO MORE posts about rakes and antes. [/ QUOTE ] bodog payout is a TERRIBLE idea, please stop posting stupid things, I repeat STOP POSTING.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
