|
|
#11
10-15-2006, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Notre Dame bias. Notre Dame is nowhere near as good as Cal or Texas are. [/ QUOTE ] Harris - 0.680 Coaches - 0.689 Computer - 0.730 it's those damned catholic computers! [/ QUOTE ] MARGIN OF VICTORY. 
|
|
#13
10-15-2006, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 16 Rutgers 6-0 24 416 .000 19 415 .268 .000 0 .395 [/ QUOTE ] Yes sir, look at them Scarlet Knights. [/ QUOTE ] Enjoy it now... Pitt is taking them down next Saturday. ESPN2 game.
|
|
#14
10-15-2006, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though [/ QUOTE ] We need new computers then. They lost by almost 4 TD's at home. They needed a miracle to beat a crappy MSU team. How they are ranked by anybody, computer or human, above Cal or Tennessee is ridiculous.
|
|
#15
10-15-2006, 06:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
1. OSU 2. USC 3. Michigan 4. Auburn 5. West Virginia 6. Florida 7. Louisville 8. Notre Dame 9. Texas 10. Cal [/ QUOTE ] I'd put WV at 4. 5+ is kind of a toss up. Well, except for ND being in there. No way are they #8 in that group. b
|
|
#16
10-15-2006, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
I'm very happy to see Florida so high in this. It seems to me very possible they still contend for the national title. OSU over Michigan, Cal over USC, and WVU/Louisville both losing somethow....
Quite possible I'd say. UF runnign the table should actually rank them higher than an undefeated WVU or Louisville in my mind. Strength of schedule difference is nuts.
|
|
#17
10-15-2006, 06:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though [/ QUOTE ] We need new computers then. They lost by almost 4 TD's at home. They needed a miracle to beat a crappy MSU team. How they are ranked by anybody, computer or human, above Cal or Tennessee is ridiculous. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure that the BCS computers factor in potential viewers in a big bowl game into the rankings. Kinda the BCS's way of helping Norte Dame get into the big game.
|
|
#18
10-15-2006, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though [/ QUOTE ] We need new computers then. They lost by almost 4 TD's at home. They needed a miracle to beat a crappy MSU team. How they are ranked by anybody, computer or human, above Cal or Tennessee is ridiculous. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure that the BCS computers factor in potential viewers in a big bowl game into the rankings. Kinda the BCS's way of helping Norte Dame get into the big game. [/ QUOTE ] USA poll has them at #8 also. b
|
|
#19
10-15-2006, 06:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Notre Dame is higher in the computers than they are in the polls. Nice try, though [/ QUOTE ] We need new computers then. They lost by almost 4 TD's at home. They needed a miracle to beat a crappy MSU team. How they are ranked by anybody, computer or human, above Cal or Tennessee is ridiculous. [/ QUOTE ] You don't have any idea how this actually works, do you?
|
|
#20
10-15-2006, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: BCS Rankings.
[ QUOTE ]
You don't have any idea how this actually works, do you? [/ QUOTE ] You don't have any idea how bad Michigan murdered ND, do you? I watched..it was sweet. And I watched Illinois outplay MSU from start to finish..the same MSU team that outplayed ND for 3 1/2 quarters. And based on that, and other factors, I can come to the conclusion that ND is not better than Cal or Tennessee.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
