|
|
#11
10-23-2007, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
In the Illinois primary I will be selecting from the available Green Party candidates.
|
|
#14
10-23-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 politics forum had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] fyp seriously, poker players balancing the budget... el oh el
|
|
#15
10-23-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Pick a spot to start 2+2landia and I will move my freind. [/ QUOTE ] http://freestateproject.org/
|
|
#16
10-23-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois.
|
|
#17
10-23-2007, 06:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition?
|
|
#18
10-23-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though. We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition? [/ QUOTE ] There are a couple more people than your dad and myself. Also, there are no dead people on our petitions...us Greens hate being compared to the democrats. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#20
10-23-2007, 08:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
[ QUOTE ]
Jesus. Looks like the Ron Paul supporters have spammed another online poll.... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I've been shipping people here from a dozen other sites to get them to vote on it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
