#1
|
|||
|
|||
Theory - EP in Full Ring
After reading the section A Preflop Strategy in NLHTAP I've started rethinking my starting hand requirements in EP. Assuming you're the first in the pot, effective stacks 100BBish and no reads or stats on anyone, what do you with the following hands in EP in a 9- or 10-handed game?
1. JJ 2. 22 3. 65s 4. A7s 5. KQs 6. AJs 7. AJo |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
The correct answer depends on the table character.
You would do fine if folded all of those except JJ. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
JJ and maybe 65s. That's it.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Assuming 1st orbit, no reads, small stakes ....
1. JJ - raise 4xBB 2. 22 - limp 3. 65s - fold 4. A7s - fold 5. KQs - fold 6. AJs - fold 7. AJo - fold mj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
1. UL
2. UL 3. UL 4. UL 5. UL 6. UL 7. Fold! UL = Usually limp Fold some of those hands (probably suited ace and the small pair) if you're likely to face a big raise. Happy? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming 1st orbit, no reads, small stakes .... 1. JJ - raise 4xBB 2. 22 - limp 3. 65s - fold 4. A7s - fold 5. KQs - fold 6. AJs - fold 7. AJo - fold [/ QUOTE ] Spot on IMO. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Fold KQs?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Hardly anyone is tight enough in EP or loose enough in LP.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
1. JJ - raise
2. 22 - limp 3. 65s -first orbit ? I might raise to develop a loose table image but normally would fold 4. A7s - fold 5. KQs - raise 6. AJs - raise 7. AJo - fold edit: if dealt 22 UTG I raise or fold |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
Fold KQs? [/ QUOTE ] 9 or 10 handed I fold KQs UTG without a second thought. |
|
|