|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
beat- you have spent 2k posts discussing poker
go get laid your a waste of air nerd/virgin |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
OP got pwnd.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
I don't play limit but that's pretty awful.
Ask your friend for a street-by-street analysis. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
The only questionable part for me is calling the flop raise but if foxyplayer was agressive previously that's fine. He's not going to fold the OESD on the turn and he raised at the end when he had the best hand.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
rr flop
r turn call riv |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
I dont poofling but it looks like a pretty good throw to me... flop is meh but depending on hero's image not horrible, turn and river are std
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
that hand is pooflinging at its best, and why i refuse to play it
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
i;m pretty sure i've played limit worse than this.
but turn is pretty freakin aweful |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Friend claimed Moneymaker played this hand perfectly.
This hand can actually be a reasonable line if...
1. Villain is known to get aggressive with his draws and strong made hands, but passive with his marginal, showdownable hands. 2. Villain is willing to 3-bet semibluff the turn with a strong draw/weaker 8. 3. Villain will never/rarely 3-bet bluff the river. ie. We aren't committed to showing down. Waiting for a safe turn is a reasonable play depending on what else Moneymaker plays like this/history of villain showing down to turn raises. Anyone commenting that flop is an automatic reraise without context doesn't know what's going on. More egregious that no one has pointed out that villain's non-river 3-bet. |
|
|