Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2007, 06:46 PM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

I wanted to start this thread to let you know that both Holmes and Polamalu are supposedly out for the Steelers. Not sure if this will move the line any, but I'm already down for 1u on Dolphins +16.

I'm undefeated in picking the spread on Dolphins games, so you should listen to me. (0-0-2)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:02 PM
digdeep digdeep is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mulholland Drive
Posts: 389
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

Dolphins should be safe for +16... but PIT is a completely different team at home vs. on the road. The most inconsistent team in the NFL - Def is allowing 11 pts per game @ home vs. 18 on the road. Off averaging 31 @ home vs. 23 on the road.

Since Ronnie Brown's departure - Miami averaging 9 pts per game...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2007, 10:25 PM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

The difference between home Pitt and road Pitt does concern me a bit, but there are very few teams who should be 16 point favorites over the Dolphins. If I've said it once, I've said it 100 times, I'll probably bet the Dolphins in every game until they win one because of the public perception that they are the worst team in the league. Holmes and Polamalu being out is just gravy.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2007, 11:30 PM
alwardc4 alwardc4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning plo
Posts: 461
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

With the spread at 39% of the over/under, there may be some correlation for a parlay. If you think Miami has some value, then parlaying it with the under could be good.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2007, 12:09 AM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

[ QUOTE ]
With the spread at 39% of the over/under, there may be some correlation for a parlay. If you think Miami has some value, then parlaying it with the under could be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

*kicks self for not having money at a book that allows parlays and teasers*

Anyways, I think the other thread concluded that there really isn't any correlation between dogs and the under and that this year was merely an aberration, though admittedly I didn't read it in depth.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-21-2007, 12:34 AM
alwardc4 alwardc4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning plo
Posts: 461
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With the spread at 39% of the over/under, there may be some correlation for a parlay. If you think Miami has some value, then parlaying it with the under could be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

*kicks self for not having money at a book that allows parlays and teasers*

Anyways, I think the other thread concluded that there really isn't any correlation between dogs and the under and that this year was merely an aberration, though admittedly I didn't read it in depth.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I think it is minimal if there.

That thread covered games that were at least 25% of the total. When the percentage gets this high, I am not sure.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:17 PM
Performify Performify is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sports Betting forum
Posts: 3,847
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

Thanks for starting this, kyro. Sorry i was slacking.

-P
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2007, 05:56 PM
cato-tonia cato-tonia is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 63
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With the spread at 39% of the over/under, there may be some correlation for a parlay. If you think Miami has some value, then parlaying it with the under could be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

*kicks self for not having money at a book that allows parlays and teasers*

Anyways, I think the other thread concluded that there really isn't any correlation between dogs and the under and that this year was merely an aberration, though admittedly I didn't read it in depth.

[/ QUOTE ]

there is a book that doesn't permit such things? honest to god?!

-c
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2007, 05:57 PM
Proline Fiend Proline Fiend is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 92
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

[ QUOTE ]
Dolphins should be safe for +16... but PIT is a completely different team at home vs. on the road. The most inconsistent team in the NFL - Def is allowing 11 pts per game @ home vs. 18 on the road. Off averaging 31 @ home vs. 23 on the road.

Since Ronnie Brown's departure - Miami averaging 9 pts per game...

[/ QUOTE ]

Miami has been consistent [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2007, 06:12 PM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melting Sabrina
Posts: 24,320
Default Re: ***OFFICIAL MNF FOOTBALL 11/26/07 (Miami at Pittsburgh)***

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With the spread at 39% of the over/under, there may be some correlation for a parlay. If you think Miami has some value, then parlaying it with the under could be good.

[/ QUOTE ]

*kicks self for not having money at a book that allows parlays and teasers*

Anyways, I think the other thread concluded that there really isn't any correlation between dogs and the under and that this year was merely an aberration, though admittedly I didn't read it in depth.

[/ QUOTE ]

there is a book that doesn't permit such things? honest to god?!

-c

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I wanted to test out analyzing games without delving too much into the actual line-shopping at first. My friend suggested this place and it's been pretty bad. I have another $100 or so in bets I have to make before I can withdraw but once I can, I won't be betting there.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.