Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Heads Up Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2007, 07:44 AM
Shizzle12345 Shizzle12345 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mordegai, the jiddish clown
Posts: 3,557
Default lower stakes HU NL not beatable?

I started to play some 100NL hu, and pple said its not beatable, because of the rake. Is that true? There are alot of idiots sitting in, an dif you got a edge you can easily destroy them.. So shouldnt that make up for it. And what about rakeback?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2007, 09:20 AM
Rakshasa Rakshasa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Constant suicide watch
Posts: 75
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

It's beatable despite the rake. Different sites have different rake structures though so take that into consideration. Ipoker caps rake at $1 HU while FTP caps it at $0.50. Still, you can make an argument for not playing HU unless you're rolled for NL400 or so.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:29 AM
En Passant En Passant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Junkyard
Posts: 1,253
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

Limit > not beatable
NL > beatable
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:46 AM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

If you're playing 50 or 100nl think of it this way.

150+ hands per table/hour
@ 50nl = 1 stack+, that has "disappeared"
@ 100nl = prolly 2/3 of a stack has "disappeared"

Do you have that kind of an edge on your competition ?

that is the question.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2007, 10:50 AM
jakeduke jakeduke is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: grad school
Posts: 1,086
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

I don't pay anything close to $50 per 150 hands at 100NL. I don't know where you got those numbers from, but they're way off. According to PT's rake stats, (which are off for 6max but could be right for HU) I paid 4.60 in rake during a 160 hand session at one table yesterday.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:05 AM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

Heads-Up: rake will be collected on "1-on-1" tables at a rate of $0.05 rake per $1.00 in the pot, up to a maximum of $0.50 rake per hand.

If you're very loose pf 50+ VPIP (like a lot of lower stakes HU players), raise + call + flop bet/call pretty much maxs out your rake at 100nl.

My figures are a bit over but not too far off. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:08 AM
jus222 jus222 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

Wow it sure is beatable ,have only been playing n/l cash 100 3 weeks, and in that time i have played at least 30 different players and won over $1000,and only one session have i been eaten away by the rake,and that was this morning, because me and the other player were so evenly matched ,i should have just left the table but i was to proud to stand up first(i am an idiot sometimes). gl at the tables jus
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:24 AM
kolotoure kolotoure is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Raising the flop
Posts: 8,167
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

Ask lj to post his graph, he seems to think it is beatable
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:28 AM
RepulseMonkey RepulseMonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 150
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

[ QUOTE ]
only one session have i been eaten away by the rake,and that was this morning, because me and the other player were so evenly matched ,i should have just left the table but i was to proud to stand up first(i am an idiot sometimes).

[/ QUOTE ]

that makes 2 of you. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Therein lies the answer. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2007, 11:33 AM
MasterLJ MasterLJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PARTY PRIME!!!!!!
Posts: 5,631
Default Re: lower stakes HU not beatable?

Not beatable!

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.