100K hand stats post

[Marquis]

[ QUOTE ]
Marquis,

How much rake have you payed over all these hands?

[/ QUOTE ]

3.9K!

In my database, rake paid is about 1/2 of the amount won in full ring, and roughly 2/3 of the amount won in shorthanded games.

[Hielko]

Impressive winrate

And I don't understand why you don't move up, I think you are going to beat 2/4 without problems for a higher $/hour rate.

[MrWookie]

[ QUOTE ]
you are my hero.

also, note that vpip <20 for full ring games is plenty profitable. 19/9 is the new 22/12!

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think we've ragged on people for 19/9 stats, no? Just the 15/4 schmucks.

[MrWookie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You're reading it wrong. He's made a little over 6k, but we don't know about his bonuses and such. It's impressive regardless.

[/ QUOTE ]

He said "Roughly half my poker earnings have come from bonus whoring."

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess I missed that part. Oh well. That's in line with what I'd expect from a reasonably aggressive bonus whore who logs 100k hands.

[Marquis]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you are my hero.

also, note that vpip <20 for full ring games is plenty profitable. 19/9 is the new 22/12!

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think we've ragged on people for 19/9 stats, no? Just the 15/4 schmucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt I play a 19/9 style at full ring anymore. Most of that came before I learned 6-max and presumably became looser and more aggressive preflop.

I think a significant part of those preflop numbers are a function of where one plays or what kind of tables they choose to play at.

[Marquis]

[ QUOTE ]
Impressive winrate

And I don't understand why you don't move up, I think you are going to beat 2/4 without problems for a higher $/hour rate.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know what effect differences in rake structure have, but do you think that I can 3-table 2/4 6-max at a 1.6BB/100 winrate? That would be the equivalent if the rake was the same.

If I was making even 2.5 I doubt I would enjoy myself as much, but that's a different story.

[Hielko]

If you are beating 0.5/1 with these number you can probably beat 2/4 with a winrate that is atleast above 2bb/100 (and why no 4 tables instead of 3?). I'm beating 2/4 with more than 2BB/100 and I doubt if I can get a 6BB/100 winrate at 0.5/1.

[sean c]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Impressive winrate

And I don't understand why you don't move up, I think you are going to beat 2/4 without problems for a higher $/hour rate.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know what effect differences in rake structure have, but do you think that I can 3-table 2/4 6-max at a 1.6BB/100 winrate? That would be the equivalent if the rake was the same.

If I was making even 2.5 I doubt I would enjoy myself as much, but that's a different story.

[/ QUOTE ]

Marquis,

It depends on the site but pretty much yes and its not even close. Once you learn how to deal with lagtards who have somewhat of a clue your set. No other adjustments need to be made. FWIW i have moved from .5/1 to 2/4 in the last 60 days and a solid game works like a champ at 2/4.

[JussiUt]

I know you like comfort and you don't like pressure. Well, I'm damn sure that with that winrate you could play 2/4 and comfortably beat it. So, just take the leap of faith. You'll get used to the higher variance and bigger pots pretty soon and your hourly rate will grow.

[milesdyson]

lol, look at your 6-max blind numbers, 0.04 and 0.05. must feel so sick.