$114 hand vs. Ryanghall

[Eagles]

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (9 handed) converter

SB (t1715)
BB (t1905)
UTG (t285)
UTG+1 (t1470)
Hero (t1470)
MP2 (t1485)
MP3 (t1735)
CO (t1455)
Button (t1980)

Preflop: Hero is MP1 with J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to t285</font>, UTG+1 calls t285, <font color="#CC3333">Hero ???
Ryanghall is utg+1

[Sykes]

I FAILED IN READING.

[Pasterbator]

edit: I failed every reading test i ever had. Time to reevaluate!

[Eagles]

You missed stack sizes utg is all in

[Pasterbator]

After thinking more about it, in UTG+1, his range to call this is probably TT+, AK at the loosest. Against that range, you're JJ is only 43% to win. If you remove AK from that list (since he would probably just push with it) you're only 35%.

So fold.

[suzzer99]

Why wouldn't he reraise KK, QQ and probably AA?

[Sykes]

[ QUOTE ]
Why wouldn't he reraise KK, QQ and probably AA?

[/ QUOTE ]

For the same reason he wouldn't re-raise 99/TT/JJ/AQ/AK.

[Inyaface]

[ QUOTE ]
You missed stack sizes utg is all in

[/ QUOTE ]

OOPS
shove

[gisb0rne]

I fold and it's not even close. I put him on AA or maybe KK. The raise is so big relative to the blinds that if people call behind him they are making a very big mistake. Thus by flat calling he gains the possiblity of reraises behind him, without the risk of allowing people in too cheaply.

[Inyaface]

Fold and I don't think its close