Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-25-2007, 05:28 PM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not Absolute
Posts: 4,535
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

PSS is Pokersitescout.com
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:06 PM
wonderwes wonderwes is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,551
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

Even if you win the jackpot, you'll probably get some run around from UB support on cashouts. It will sit there in pending and emails to their support address will go into a black hole.

Amazing the decline of this site when Neteller left US players.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-25-2007, 07:18 PM
Oliver Nipples Oliver Nipples is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 486
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

Why no BBJ Roshambo tables?!?!?!?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:08 PM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not Absolute
Posts: 4,535
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

You see these terms? The hand that loses only gets 32.5% of the BBJ. UB keeps 10% of the BBJ while rolling over 25% (so they are really taking a 12.5% rake) and they even pay players who aren't at the table when it hits as long as they are playing the same limit.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-25-2007, 10:37 PM
spkid spkid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brotherly Love
Posts: 147
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How much more rake do they take? Is it still gonna be good to be playing these games?

[/ QUOTE ]

$.50 a hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

How much was it before? Assume I play 1/2 or 2/4nl.

[/ QUOTE ]

$.00 There was no bad beat rake before.

[/ QUOTE ]

So there is a flat $0.50 taken out of every pot at any table that qualifies for the BBJ?

Do they state this anywhere, or are they just not going to mention it?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:11 PM
tice03 tice03 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 11
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

[ QUOTE ]
PSS is Pokersitescout.com

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:44 PM
gila gila is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 1,740
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How much more rake do they take? Is it still gonna be good to be playing these games?

[/ QUOTE ]

$.50 a hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

How much was it before? Assume I play 1/2 or 2/4nl.

[/ QUOTE ]

$.00 There was no bad beat rake before.

[/ QUOTE ]

So there is a flat $0.50 taken out of every pot at any table that qualifies for the BBJ?

Do they state this anywhere, or are they just not going to mention it?

[/ QUOTE ]

Raked hands only. They don't take out of unraked hands.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-25-2007, 11:47 PM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not Absolute
Posts: 4,535
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

Is the $.50 rake anywhere on their site?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-26-2007, 12:02 AM
LT22 LT22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Making Vids
Posts: 352
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

Your loss is your gain!

If you lose with quad Eights or better you'll take home a hefty cut of the Bad Beat Jackpot that grows by leaps and bounds with every hand that's dealt at our Bad Beat tables. We collect $.50 from every raked pot at our Bad Beat tables to build up the Jackpot until some desperately unlucky soul gets coolered by a cold deck...and wins a bundle!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-26-2007, 11:49 AM
gila gila is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 1,740
Default Re: UB has added bad-beat jackpots!

[ QUOTE ]
and they even pay players who aren't at the table when it hits as long as they are playing the same limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is so stupid! So, I guess if we decide to keep playing here, and on these tables, we should be "crossing" limits to maximize the chance of being at the correct limit at the correct time? This is raw.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.