|
|
|
|
#1
11-24-2007, 02:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
This is the homer in you talking. USC is significantly better at 20 of the 22 starting positons on the field. [/ QUOTE ] No way. USC's offense has been nothing special this year. 
|
|
#3
11-24-2007, 02:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Give us Dixon, Paysinger, Colvin, Johnson and Bacon back and we will beat a fully healthy USC 7 times out of 10 on a neutral site. [/ QUOTE ] This is the homer in you talking. USC is significantly better at 20 of the 22 starting positons on the field. [/ QUOTE ] No way. USC's offense has been nothing special this year. [/ QUOTE ] uhh what? 38 vs Idaho 49 @ Nebraska 47 vs Wash St 27 @ Wash* 24 vs Stanford* 20 vs AZ* 38 @ Notre Dame* 24 @ Oregon* 24 vs Oregon St 24 @ Cal 44 @ ASU *games with multiple significant offensive injuries, including the quarterback
|
|
#4
11-24-2007, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
uhh what? 38 vs Idaho 49 @ Nebraska 47 vs Wash St 27 @ Wash* 24 vs Stanford* 20 vs AZ* 38 @ Notre Dame* 24 @ Oregon* 24 vs Oregon St 24 @ Cal 44 @ ASU *games with multiple significant offensive injuries, including the quarterback [/ QUOTE ] That is very loose use of the asterisk...
|
|
#5
11-24-2007, 03:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] uhh what? 38 vs Idaho 49 @ Nebraska 47 vs Wash St 27 @ Wash* 24 vs Stanford* 20 vs AZ* 38 @ Notre Dame* 24 @ Oregon* 24 vs Oregon St 24 @ Cal 44 @ ASU *games with multiple significant offensive injuries, including the quarterback [/ QUOTE ] That is very loose use of the asterisk... [/ QUOTE ] It's just so unfair that SC has to suffer injuries while the rest of the conference skates by unscathed.
|
|
#6
11-24-2007, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] uhh what? 38 vs Idaho 49 @ Nebraska 47 vs Wash St 27 @ Wash* 24 vs Stanford* 20 vs AZ* 38 @ Notre Dame* 24 @ Oregon* 24 vs Oregon St 24 @ Cal 44 @ ASU *games with multiple significant offensive injuries, including the quarterback [/ QUOTE ] That is very loose use of the asterisk... [/ QUOTE ] It's just so unfair that SC has to suffer injuries while the rest of the conference skates by unscathed. [/ QUOTE ] now you're just trolling. we were discussing whether usc had an impressive offense this year not how unfair injuries are.
|
|
#7
11-24-2007, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2007 Pac 10 football thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] uhh what? 38 vs Idaho 49 @ Nebraska 47 vs Wash St 27 @ Wash* 24 vs Stanford* 20 vs AZ* 38 @ Notre Dame* 24 @ Oregon* 24 vs Oregon St 24 @ Cal 44 @ ASU *games with multiple significant offensive injuries, including the quarterback [/ QUOTE ] That is very loose use of the asterisk... [/ QUOTE ] I disagree. We lost 3 offensive lineman including the center during the UW game, and they didn't all come back until after Oregon. This in itself is significant enough, but when you couple that with an injured QB and running back I don't see how you can feel that way.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
