#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
There's nothing wrong with your line. Firing the turn is probably less exploitable but against a guy who wont fold any piece of the board I like this hand.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
I hate the raise preflop
otherwise it seems fine |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
[ QUOTE ]
I hate the raise preflop otherwise it seems fine [/ QUOTE ] i missed that hero was SB, I thought he was button. just limp preflop is best |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
Ok, thanks. I'm gonna think through preflop, I've practically never completed the SB with only one limper.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
I would just complete the SB also. Flop is standard. As for turn, at least in small stakes, I think you played very well. He probably won´t fold to you now, and also the 5 complete a quite probable draw. So you check and call with good odds. Then river I think you played well again, though I see myself calling too much is spots like this.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, thanks. I'm gonna think through preflop, I've practically never completed the SB with only one limper. [/ QUOTE ] I probably play it the same. Two questions for you. 1. Always raising from SB with 1 limper. I usually avoid playing raised pots OOP, and this seems to put you exactly in that position. Why? 2. Do you think he could play a set this way, betting small because of many possible str8s? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
Yeah, I hate raising from SB. Other than that this seems fine, I think there are a lot of close-to-neutral ev decisions in this hand (betting the turn, calling the the river).
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50 - JTs line check
complete sb, bet flop/turn = best line
it's good to mix up your play in the blinds but in this cause he has 40bb and seems like a passive player i'd just complete from the blinds |
|
|