Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:24 PM
madmonk madmonk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 79
Default Re: Last Words on The Kenny Patrik Thing

I think 2p2 needs hot or not type of voting system so we can democratically choose the top 20.

I also think that we should open thread for this subject and for all the players in top 20.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:50 PM
Joseph Hewes Joseph Hewes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 97
Default Re: Last Words on The Kenny Patrik Thing

I nominate DN.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 06:57 PM
sapol sapol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 804
Default Re: Last Words on The Kenny Patrik Thing

why hasn't anyone posted a serious list of say 50-75 players and we voted to see what 2p2 thinks? (bastard and grim should not be options)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:09 PM
PITTM PITTM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: this forum again I will ban you. If you send me an email or private message, I will ban you.
Posts: 11,293
Default Re: Last Words on The Kenny Patrik Thing

[ QUOTE ]
why hasn't anyone posted a serious list of say 50-75 players and we voted to see what 2p2 thinks? (bastard and grim should not be options)

[/ QUOTE ]

because a list of 50-75 of the best would def exclude some of the best and be ridiculously, ridiculously biased. Also we know too little about everything.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2007, 07:19 PM
sapol sapol is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 804
Default Re: Last Words on The Kenny Patrik Thing

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
why hasn't anyone posted a serious list of say 50-75 players and we voted to see what 2p2 thinks? (bastard and grim should not be options)

[/ QUOTE ]

because a list of 50-75 of the best would def exclude some of the best and be ridiculously, ridiculously biased. Also we know too little about everything.

[/ QUOTE ]

agree...maybe 50 was too small of a number but what about 150? (I'm not saying our list would be the correct one, it would just be the summarized opinions of 2p2)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.