|
|
#11
11-28-2007, 11:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Caught in the middle again.
Why all the discussion over the PF play?
Given the reads folding is not an option, therefore I assume most people are thinking capping is correct. Why? The maniac button or the CO are going to cap (according to the OP), then why is it better that we do? 
|
|
#13
11-28-2007, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Caught in the middle again.
[ QUOTE ]
Fold preflop?!?!?! WTF! WTF! WTF! Cap for value please. mkthanks. [/ QUOTE ] qft
|
|
#14
11-28-2007, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Caught in the middle again.
[ QUOTE ]
unless this game is 4 handed or less 100% fold-"only call"??? 4-handed raise 100% call 0% you said in another post you were not talking about preflop play-well you should. Stop reading so much of the Ed Miller stuff its messing with your head. [/ QUOTE ] Please read the other posts. Thank you.
|
|
#15
11-28-2007, 01:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Caught in the middle again.
Ok-was late last night and I totally missed the all in sb part. I change my mind capping for value is fine-but agree to this your looking for 3 three flop types and only one is good xx9,842,Q72 coordinated big card flops and yur fk'd just like the one in the post. The value this hand has comes from dragging these donks along to the river which they will due to the big pot-conversly you will have the odds to justify shiity calls as well-the srew the variance in favor of +ev is a scary way to play poker
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
