Updated Cliff Notes On Absolute Poker Scandal (18th October)

[adanthar]

wow

[imabigdeal]

hahhahahahaha admo that is just [censored] awesome. A++++

[MrTimCaum]

ADMO WINS

[NNNNOOOOONAN]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]



[/ QUOTE ]
1st

edit: awesome

reedit: meaning an awesome photoshop, hopefully there isn't an innocent name on there or something, etc, etc

[/ QUOTE ]

tbh, i could def. see kevin bacon being involved in something like this.

loser just can't get over the fact that he's never going to make another "footloose"

[suzzer99]

Admo you are in a class by yourself that's several levels above any of us mortals. The infinity symbol is genius.

[CCx]

i think admo means 'friggin awesome' in swahili

[Matfrid]

[ QUOTE ]
The privileges would never be on the client side, but on the server side. They would never be authorized to go online if it was done at client side.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yet again, you speak only in the negative. You are correct to deny that the client would not be responsible for the logic that decides which privileges a well-behaved client has. This is not anything that has been proposed either.

The fact that we can safely assume that access restrictions are handled on the server does not, however, mean that it is impossible for clients to have different levels or privileges. A developers tool could very well bypass all common protocols and have access to all data on the server. An administrative client could very well have more privileges than a common gaming client. And so on.

[Johnny#5]

deleted

[suzzer99]

My digg link is deleted.

[N 82 50 24]

I am not going to digg that post either.