|
|
#62
06-17-2007, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My recent graph is 8-10 tables fwiw, and there's some really healthy tilt in there as well. IMO your winrate per-table doesn't have to drop at all if you have sufficient raw reflexes to play the same number of hands and can think quickly without making gigantic mistakes. However your overall winrate will certainly drop because of the lower fishiness of your 7th, 10th tables etc. But provided you can find 10 fishy tables (insert Party joke here) I honestly believe the cap for your 10 tabling winrate can be the same as your 1-tabling winrate. [/ QUOTE ] Not true. On 8+ tables you can certainly play a solid mechanical game if you're good, but no way you can make all the little adjustments that really optimize your play against the exact lineup and stack sizes at each table. I've said this before but I believe that a really good player could make around 15 PTBB/100 on 4 tables and there's no way you can match that with more tables because it requires too much study of your opponents patterns and history. [/ QUOTE ] Gah such a frustrating attitude. Firstly, lets just end this debate with one word: cts. QED. Also: - Where on earth did you pull your figures of "4 tables" and "8 tables" from? 100 hands/hr at eight tables equals one hand every 6 seconds, most of which are folds no matter what style you play and the vast majority of which will be routine. With enough practice it takes less than a second to glance at a PT stat or note and adjust your line accordingly. This leaves a lot of time spare, so when tough decisions come up you have several seconds at least. - You don't appear to be referring to yourself when you talk about a "really good player", so how would you know what's involved in attaining their winrate? - For 99/100 hands even the most creative player will have a standard line they are following, as most situations they've encountered thousands of times. - The Betpot script, auto-reloaders, etc. and simple reflexes reduce the amount of time that standard hands take, increasing the amount of time left for tough decisions - Re: study of patterns and history. This can be done outside of play-time through PT review, and notes can be applied for significant patterns - I think by "mechanical, robotic" you mean primarily that your play will become tighter and more straightforward, and I personally know this simply isn't true.  Also just had the chip lead in the Party 300k but some Donk sucked me out of an 80k pot dammnit! [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] 
|
|
#66
06-17-2007, 04:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
ok this will be so newb, but the number on my general info tab in PT, that's my PTBB or just my BB? and if it's just BB i divide it by 2 for PTBB? Christ... [/ QUOTE ] # on general info tab = PTBB
|
|
#68
06-17-2007, 04:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
[ QUOTE ]
too many random and nonrandom factors affect winrate. you just gotta try and play your best not expect much and hope for the best gl [/ QUOTE ] best post in this thread so far
|
|
#69
06-17-2007, 04:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: please post your winrate/nl 100-nl 200
First 100k hands - 10ptbb/100 at 100NL, second 100k hands 4ptbb/100 at 50/50 200NL and 100NL. I was a much, much better player over the last 100k hands also.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
