Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > Tournament Circuit/WSOP
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-10-2007, 12:58 PM
chube chube is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 166
Default Is this ruling correct?

As reported on pokernews:

Out of Turn, Now Out of Tournament

On a flop of 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], the small blind bets out 4,800 and Swedish player Alex Holm goes into the tank. Before he can act, a player behind him announces "All in" (holding around 25,000). The floor is called over and it is ruled that if Alex calls, the out of turn action will stand.

Alex calls, the out of turn player is all in, the SB folds, and Alex quickly calls, opening 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] for a flopped set. The out of turn player has 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] for top two pair. The turn and river blank out and the out of turn player is out of the tournament.
----------------------------

Should the out of turn action have been binding? It probably didn't affect the ultimate outcome, but it seems to me that once Alex Holm calls (knowing he'll then have an allin raise behind him) it pretty much tips off the hand to the SB who may or may not of folded. At least it was the guy who acted out of turn who got "punished" but I thought in most cases out of turn action is usually nullified or stands as is.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-10-2007, 01:16 PM
KurtSF KurtSF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,983
Default Re: Is this ruling correct?

I believe the rule is that out of turn actions "may" be binding.

In this case, you're right, it kinda screws SB in that Alex knows the action behind him. Maybe the TD should have waited for Alex to finish his action before determining if the all-in was binding.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-10-2007, 04:20 PM
bwiii bwiii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 159
Default Re: Is this ruling correct?

The ruling is correct. If the Swede player were to raise, his "all-in" is not binding. It's a little confusing, but by just calling he must go all in. If someone acts out of turn more than once there should be a penalty.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2007, 11:22 PM
po-Jay-to po-Jay-to is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The OC, CA
Posts: 1,056
Default Re: Is this ruling correct?

The key verbiage on the rule is that if the action does not change by the time it gets back to the "out-of-turn" player, the floor may enforce that his action is binding. That means if the player(s) before do not raise, he can be forced to act in accordance to his previous out of turn action (in this case, an all-in). If a player raised before it returns to the out of turn player, then he will not be held to any action and he is free to act in any valid way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.