#1
|
|||
|
|||
variance question for david sklansky
player A gets KK 10x in a row and wins all in preflop v aa each time at nl 100.
player a than moves up to nl 1000, and loses all in preflop aa v kk. Is player A running Good, Bad, or Neutral and why? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
eh this is a semantics question and sklansky is not uniquely qualified to answer. Take it up with merriam webster
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
[ QUOTE ]
eh this is a semantics question and sklansky is not uniquely qualified to answer. Take it up with merriam webster [/ QUOTE ] QFT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
Is player A a goblerj, a klejrelk, or a erjeukidl?
Your question, with no defined terms, makes just as much sense. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
In addition, if I wers Sklansky, I am 100% certain I would open 0% of threads in a forum titled "Science, Math, and Philosophy" with the title, "What do I do facing this all-in bet with an overpair?" or the like.
Think about it. There are much better places for your post . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
how is my question not defined? its a very straight foward question
and hitch, my post is nothing like that |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
I will provide a useful answer. He is running good since you didn't mention he has cancer or lives in sub-Saharan Africa or anything like that.
Are you starting to see why thats a silly question now? The terms dont mean anything. wtf is "running good" in this context? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
[ QUOTE ]
how is my question not defined? [/ QUOTE ] Because good and bad have very narrow well-defined meanings for every situation, ain't that right? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
clearly im talking about running good bad or neutral in poker and not other aspects of life...
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: variance question for david sklansky
Fine, he is still running ridiculously good. Happy?
|
|
|