|
|
|
|
#1
11-15-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bonds Responds
ESPN reporting that Bonds has been indicted for perjury and obstruction of justice.
|
|
#3
11-15-2007, 08:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
Oops. [/ QUOTE ] Oops. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
|
#4
11-15-2007, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
From the old thread as said by RedBean:
[ QUOTE ] Our points are rather simple: Mine: -Barry Bonds never violated the MLB Steroid Policy. -Barry Bonds did not admit using steroids in his Grand Jury testimony. -Barry Bonds has not been indicted, much less convicted of any crime related to steroids. -Barry Bonds has not been proven to have cheated the game of baseball, as defined by the rules that govern the game. My points are matter of fact. [/ QUOTE ] One of these things is not like the other, one of these things is not as it seemed.
|
|
#5
11-15-2007, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
I really, really wish he was here right now. Its really not fair that he is out of town and will have a week to come up with some reason why this does not mean anything.
Maybe the Mitchell report will come out soon too and it will just be a pile on. No, but in all honesty, I do wish he was here. I look forward to his perspective on the matter.
|
|
#6
11-16-2007, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
I really, really wish he was here right now. Its really not fair that he is out of town and will have a week to come up with some reason why this does not mean anything. Maybe the Mitchell report will come out soon too and it will just be a pile on. No, but in all honesty, I do wish he was here. I look forward to his perspective on the matter. [/ QUOTE ] It looks like I'll be around until at least Sunday, and may not be going at all. As for the indictment, I guess we can keep it in the other thread, and let this one go the wayside now.
|
|
#7
11-16-2007, 09:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I really, really wish he was here right now. Its really not fair that he is out of town and will have a week to come up with some reason why this does not mean anything. Maybe the Mitchell report will come out soon too and it will just be a pile on. No, but in all honesty, I do wish he was here. I look forward to his perspective on the matter. [/ QUOTE ] It looks like I'll be around until at least Sunday, and may not be going at all. As for the indictment, I guess we can keep it in the other thread, and let this one go the wayside now. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry to hear you are not going. I hate when vacations get canceled. I agree though, we can let this one die as it regards to indictment talk.
|
|
#8
11-16-2007, 02:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bonds Responds
I was reading the story about Bonds' indictment on ESPN.com when I came across this paragraph:
"By the late 1990s, he'd bulked up to more than 240 pounds -- his head, in particular, becoming noticeably bigger. His physical growth was accompanied by a remarkable power surge." LOL. It was almost as if they wrote that just to piss off Red Bean.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
