less government = socialism?

[lehighguy]

He doesn't agree in the zero aggression principle though. Or, rather, he believes that one person having more stuff then another is an act of aggression, and it is ok for the other party to use force to take that stuff (I mean, it is only self defense).

By his definition, everything is an act of aggression, making non aggression a moot point.

[nietzreznor]

[ QUOTE ]
Basically, to summarise my disjointed ramblings; could a right-wing capitalist Libertarian government through its advancements of liberty and freedom (providing it maintains less government interference in ALL sectors of life; not just economic) result in major-scale (free/voluntary) socialist progress in America to the extent described above; more power to the labour force, attempts at socialist modes of production and a less subordinate population with concentrated efforts against tyrannical and (previously) unnacountable private power?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and there are many in the anarcho-libertarian movement who would hope for such a development!