Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: <---------------------
Sucks 0 0%
Blows 3 21.43%
HAHA I CAN"T BELIEVE HE ACTUALLY MADE A POLE!!!ONEZOR 11 78.57%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2006, 11:16 AM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Official Week 11 FF Thread

Still in first, I have a 2 game edge on second place which is good. Second place team is very strong so I need to keep my edge.

QBs: Peyton @ Dal

RB1: Gore vs Sea
RB2:

Green vs NE
Betts @ TB
T. Bell vs SD
M. Bell vs SD
C. William vs Washington

WR1: Roy W @ Ari
WR2: Walker vs SD
WR3: Stallworth vs Ten

Other options:

Horn vs Cincy (will he be healthy if so good matchup but so are my first 3 WRs)
Evans @ Hou (another good matchup)

TE: Gates @ Den

K: Gould vs NYJ

Def: Chicago vs NYJ

Looks like I have no real question marks. I really hate having both Denver running backs and they have both been bad lately. Is it time to waive either or both? They lost Lepsis and the line hasn't been the same since.

Our league (friendly) has a no waiver clause. So my buddy drops Portis and McGahee. Either worth picking up? I know exactly why he dropped them, I don't really want McGahee but Portis could eventually be back although he's never truly been healthy this year.

Also for late season I have decided not to pick up a QB. Should I drop someone now to pick up McNair who has been better. Green who might come back. Or Plummer who seems to have his head on straight now? Or Carr who is good week to week. Last thing I want is to not have a QB at the end of the year.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:28 PM
silentbob silentbob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 894
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

RB2: I would still start one of the Bells, whichever one is active on Sunday.

FA: Both Portis and McGahee are probably done for the season. Highly unlikely that they'll be risked when their teams are playing out the string.

Backup QB: Definitely, but not necessarily this week. You can still afford to wait and see.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:36 PM
ScottieK ScottieK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 2p2 banned where I work :(
Posts: 2,967
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

QB problem...I have P. Rivers and M. Brunell. Intend to dump Brunell, should I pick up Roethlisberger or Harrington? Thanks!

ScottieK
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:44 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

Once again, a QB issue -
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:51 PM
Aces McGee Aces McGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jammin\' at dude\'s house
Posts: 4,429
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Once again, a QB issue -

[/ QUOTE ]

I voted Wallace, a split second before I remembered that Hasselbeck might play. I think it's Seneca is Hasselbeck doesn't go.

-McGee
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:58 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

I should note that I also have Hasselbeck - you think he's a good start if he does play?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-14-2006, 01:58 PM
Aces McGee Aces McGee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jammin\' at dude\'s house
Posts: 4,429
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

[ QUOTE ]
I should note that I also have Hasselbeck - you think he's a good start if he does play?

[/ QUOTE ]

If your other options are Frye and Smith, yes.

-McGee
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:00 PM
Triumph36 Triumph36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Osi Ukin\'-yora
Posts: 9,388
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I should note that I also have Hasselbeck - you think he's a good start if he does play?

[/ QUOTE ]

If your other options are Frye and Smith, yes.

-McGee

[/ QUOTE ]

I just worry about Hasselbeck not being 100% and the coach deciding to go with Wallace halfway through the game.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:20 PM
Tom1975 Tom1975 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 932
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

Dear Mike Holmgren:

Please stop toying with my emotions. In the past 3 weeks I've slipped from second to fourth (just out of the money btw) in my league. You know who I've been starting? Good ole Freddy Taylor. 70 yards and a pile of no touchdowns because that's Drew-Maurice Jones' job, or whatever his name is. I'm hanging on watching with envy as the LJ &amp; LT owners continue to gain on me like a lion chasing down a wounded antelope. I remember how happy I was on draft day that I got the third pick. LJ-LT-Shaun? What's the difference, right? I went from being merely happy to estatic when Clinton Portis was still available in the third round. Yeah.

So as you can see, I really could use some production out of my RBs this week. He says he's been pain free for a while now. I'm no doctor, but most clean fractures heal within sevens weeks from what I've seen.

It's time Mike. Put him in, coach. For the love of God put him in.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-14-2006, 02:21 PM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Spewing since 2004.
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: Official Week 11 FF Thread

Just keep rivers. you don't need a Back up.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.