Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 11-01-2007, 12:45 AM
JDesab JDesab is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]


i would rather see skilled poker players personally

[/ QUOTE ]

so what you're saying is that you don't like jmans play on high stakes either.

raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot.

woo... skill.

you'd have been really impressed if the board had come 842 rainbow and he bet the pot ... and his opps fold. that would be wonderful.

gamblers employ much more skill than nits.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 11-01-2007, 12:56 AM
daxtrader daxtrader is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


i would rather see skilled poker players personally

[/ QUOTE ]

so what you're saying is that you don't like jmans play on high stakes either.

raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot.

woo... skill.

you'd have been really impressed if the board had come 842 rainbow and he bet the pot ... and his opps fold. that would be wonderful.

gamblers employ much more skill than nits.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly! Who showed more skill that hand? Not jman.
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 11-01-2007, 02:04 AM
ChrisV ChrisV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 5,104
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

Results oriented much? If one of the other two had had a king or whatever, you'd probably be posting about what a great read Jman made.

Jman folded in a marginal situation, that's the only thing you can say about that hand. As it turned out it was the wrong move, but it could have been right. It wasn't mathematically guaranteed to lose like a bunch of the plays the others have made (Farha's pf call with K7 vs Hellmuth, Gold's raise and subsequent checkdown vs Farha with bottom pair with 3 players yet to act behind him, etc etc).
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 11-01-2007, 02:26 AM
Jooka Jooka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 635
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]


fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position.
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 11-01-2007, 03:08 AM
Hendricks433 Hendricks433 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 50NL 6max
Posts: 2,090
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]

fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position.


[/ QUOTE ] eli was behind, and is a notorious loose caller.
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 11-01-2007, 03:44 AM
Jooka Jooka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 635
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position.


[/ QUOTE ] eli was behind, and is a notorious loose caller.

[/ QUOTE ]


Even with Eli behind and Farha to act, this is your one chance to get both to fold. Blew it. To think he or Brandon wasnt watching the game to this point is ridiculous. They knew what style eli/farha have been playing since season 1. a big bet there is required to get respect. Lose the pot later but make the continuation to get respect.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-01-2007, 05:50 AM
inyourface inyourface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 480
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
Jman folded in a marginal situation, that's the only thing you can say about that hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Newsflash Einstein, the marginal situations are the ones that separate winners from losers. Or more appropriately in this situation getting a seat on day 3 or not getting a seat by playing scared, nittish, absolutely silent and non-entertaining poker.

I hope that explains marginal situations for you
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-01-2007, 06:38 AM
Keyser. Keyser. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: cr blog!
Posts: 4,870
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

the amount of quality discussion in Televised Poker really impresses me


NOT omglol
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:11 AM
daxtrader daxtrader is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 78
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

So those loose players can take stabs at that board with crap but jman couldn't try a simple cbet with QQ? Okay so the sample size is too small obviously but when you get only a few hours to play at least loosen up a bit and be a bit more aggressive against known donks with your good hands.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:19 AM
Jbrochu Jbrochu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,068
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)

[ QUOTE ]
Newsflash Einstein, not investing lots of chips in marginal situations separates winners from losers.

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.