#191
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
i would rather see skilled poker players personally [/ QUOTE ] so what you're saying is that you don't like jmans play on high stakes either. raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot. woo... skill. you'd have been really impressed if the board had come 842 rainbow and he bet the pot ... and his opps fold. that would be wonderful. gamblers employ much more skill than nits. |
#192
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i would rather see skilled poker players personally [/ QUOTE ] so what you're saying is that you don't like jmans play on high stakes either. raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot. woo... skill. you'd have been really impressed if the board had come 842 rainbow and he bet the pot ... and his opps fold. that would be wonderful. gamblers employ much more skill than nits. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly! Who showed more skill that hand? Not jman. |
#193
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
Results oriented much? If one of the other two had had a king or whatever, you'd probably be posting about what a great read Jman made.
Jman folded in a marginal situation, that's the only thing you can say about that hand. As it turned out it was the wrong move, but it could have been right. It wasn't mathematically guaranteed to lose like a bunch of the plays the others have made (Farha's pf call with K7 vs Hellmuth, Gold's raise and subsequent checkdown vs Farha with bottom pair with 3 players yet to act behind him, etc etc). |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
raises with qq... checks when he sees the dreaded king and diamond board. folds when an opponent bets 70% of the pot on the turn. [/ QUOTE ] fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position. |
#195
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position. [/ QUOTE ] eli was behind, and is a notorious loose caller. |
#196
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fyp. not betting the flop is a mistake while in position. [/ QUOTE ] eli was behind, and is a notorious loose caller. [/ QUOTE ] Even with Eli behind and Farha to act, this is your one chance to get both to fold. Blew it. To think he or Brandon wasnt watching the game to this point is ridiculous. They knew what style eli/farha have been playing since season 1. a big bet there is required to get respect. Lose the pot later but make the continuation to get respect. |
#197
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Jman folded in a marginal situation, that's the only thing you can say about that hand. [/ QUOTE ] Newsflash Einstein, the marginal situations are the ones that separate winners from losers. Or more appropriately in this situation getting a seat on day 3 or not getting a seat by playing scared, nittish, absolutely silent and non-entertaining poker. I hope that explains marginal situations for you |
#198
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
the amount of quality discussion in Televised Poker really impresses me
NOT omglol |
#199
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
So those loose players can take stabs at that board with crap but jman couldn't try a simple cbet with QQ? Okay so the sample size is too small obviously but when you get only a few hours to play at least loosen up a bit and be a bit more aggressive against known donks with your good hands.
|
#200
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Newsflash Einstein, not investing lots of chips in marginal situations separates winners from losers. [/ QUOTE ] fyp |
|
|