Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-12-2007, 02:45 AM
Bauz Bauz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 6
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

with an aggression factor this low they show up with a flush most of the time (at least in my games).
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-12-2007, 07:52 AM
RobertJohn RobertJohn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 238
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

Here's a hand that I analyzed recently by assigning a calling range for my opponent if I were to shove and used Pokerstove to calculate my equity against it. Hopefully you guys could provide comments on the positive/negative aspects of it. DISCLAIMER: preflop is probably bad.

EXAMPLE HAND:

Poker Stars
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $41.25
Hero: $42.50
CO: $83.70
Button: $89.15
SB: $32.35
BB: $28.20

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is UTG+1 with 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $2</font>, 4 folds, UTG calls.

Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($4.75, 2 players)
UTG checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $3.5</font>, <font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $9</font> . . .

I haven't played many hands with this villain so I can't get a good read on his check-raising range.

However, up to this point I had been playing pretty aggressively and so I thought besides his obvious big hands he might also check-raise here sometimes as a bluff.

If he calls my jam, he might have something like:

9c9s,9d9s,9h9s,88-77,33,A9s,K9s,T8s,98s,97s, and A9o.

This range consists of:

A few combos of top set, middle and bottom set, top two, a couple combos of T8, the strongest top pairs, and occasionally he will have played a really weird overpair. He also might sometimes stacks off with second pair: 88.

My equity in this case is around 34%.

Given that I have 34% equity when called, he has to fold here greater than 30% of the time for me to start showing a profit on a shove.

Questions:

a) with such little info to act on, is it reasonable to assume that my opponent will fold &gt; 30% of the time with this action sequence?
b) what is a decent estimate of an average opponent's check-raising range on this board with this preflop/flop action?
c) if I do shove, is the calling range I've assigned to my opponent a decent one?

Any comments on my assumptions or methods would be great.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-12-2007, 10:20 AM
Tre976 Tre976 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Pete Fl
Posts: 25
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

I'd put him on A9,K9,q9,j9,109,88,A7 or possibly 1010,108,98
The CR to $9 - to me - seems that he wants to end the hand now.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-12-2007, 11:46 AM
NL Newbie NL Newbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,551
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

[ QUOTE ]
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

SB ($32)
BB ($34.60)
UTG ($66.15)
Hero ($24.90)
CO ($15)
Button ($31.95)

Preflop: Hero is MP with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $0.35.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $1.25</font>, CO (poster) calls $1, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>.

Flop: ($2.95) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $2</font>, CO calls $2.

Turn: ($6.95) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $4</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises to $11.65</font>, Hero calls ??

what is the range of my villain?

45/18/0.93 180hands

[/ QUOTE ]

Heres my take on the analysis of this hand, something which im working on.

I may be wrong, so dont take it for gospel.


So his range is wide on the flop, we can bet for value/take pot down. +EV bet.


[/b]Turn analysis:[/b]

Now here its probably wise to do two things, first give him a VERY TIGHT RANGE followed by a more optimistic/wider range.


Tight range:
Flush (9s8s will do for pokerstove, a flush is a flush and we have no redraw anyway so its fine)
Sets(QQ/TT/22)
2pair but ONLY WITH REDRAW TO FLUSH, Qs or Ts).

Poker stove raw range: QQ,TT,22,9s8s,QcTs,QdTs,QhTs,QsTc,QsTd,QsTh


Equity here: 7%





Wider Range
Same as tight range but we add others now.
2pair without redraws(QTo),
TPTK+Redraw,
TPTK+no redraw


Stove range: QQ,TT,22,AQs,AQo,QTo

Equity here: 37% (&lt;2:1 required).



Now if we interpolate this range of %7 to 37% and look at our pot odds.

$7 pot + $4 bet + $12 shove =$23 vs $8 to call. 3:1 pot odds.


Optimistic range, easy call.
Tight range, Easy fold.

However the wider range isnt very wide, due to the line he took i feel he has FD alot more than say KQ here hence i discounted KQ to add more weight to flush.

So i dont mind a fold or call in this spot due to odds, however you will see a flush alot. Will it be more that 3 out of 4 times?
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:03 PM
boardertj boardertj is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 69
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

So did the study group die? There is no longer a sticky at the top of the forum and I see no discussion of day 8 yet... I think the Equity and Maximization discussions would be very useful and SPR as well. Lets not let this die uNL!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-16-2007, 06:59 AM
inverted inverted is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 273
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

I actually think that this range is the most important, it hasn't really had much input though. The equity chapter seemed quite straight forward and Maximization obviously relies on the range. So it's a shame that this chapter hasn't been covered very thoughtfully.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-16-2007, 02:33 PM
Monster207 Monster207 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: WTF IS JUICE?!?!
Posts: 300
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

I really hope this gets going again. I thoroughly enjoyed the book and I feel that range is quite important. I was really hoping to get some help on creating effective SPR's when at a 6max table. I find myself using the REM process much more effectively which is nice but I'd really like to work on the SPR concept. (once the REM section is done obviously)
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-16-2007, 05:05 PM
Matt Flynn Matt Flynn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Badugi, USA
Posts: 3,285
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

we're still here. a ton going on and Sunny's been on a cruise. E/M, commmitment threshold and SPR still to come. dunno who unstickied the sticky.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-17-2007, 08:36 AM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

[ QUOTE ]
we're still here. a ton going on and Sunny's been on a cruise. E/M, commmitment threshold and SPR still to come. dunno who unstickied the sticky.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would a mod be resticky the thread?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-17-2007, 04:42 PM
QTip QTip is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: OH
Posts: 6,131
Default Re: PNL Study Group Day 7: The REM Process \"Intro\" and \"R is for Range

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
we're still here. a ton going on and Sunny's been on a cruise. E/M, commmitment threshold and SPR still to come. dunno who unstickied the sticky.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would a mod be resticky the thread?

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.