|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 30/60 tricky spot vs. opp w/ a lot of history
Qdxd seems likely, I think you can fold because there is no way he thinks you'll give him credit for backdooring you.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 30/60 tricky spot vs. opp w/ a lot of history
[ QUOTE ]
Qdxd seems likely, I think you can fold because there is no way he thinks you'll give him credit for backdooring you. [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't an ABC player who just made a backdoor draw go for a check/raise here? His line makes no sense to me...unless Villain thinks that Hero bet Ace high twice on this board. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 30/60 tricky spot vs. opp w/ a lot of history
[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't an ABC player who just made a backdoor draw go for a check/raise here? His line makes no sense to me...unless Villain thinks that Hero bet Ace high, or 66-TT, or JT-J8 twice on this board. [/ QUOTE ] Either call and expect to lose ~75% of the time (still a +ev call) or raise and turn your hand into a bluff, which might be more +ev since I think he has a weak Q here quite a bit. It just depends on whether he's bet/calling or bet/folding QT or Q8s here/. How fishy was the coldcaller? The worse the coldcaller plays, the more weak Q's bb likely has in his range. The viability of turning your hand into a bluff depends on how tenacious a value bettor your are. If you would always raise QT+ on this river, a bluff is much more likely to work than it would if you only value raise 2 pair+ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 30/60 tricky spot vs. opp w/ a lot of history
i think raising is rediculous.. that turns a slightly marginal valued call into a spew when he calls/3-bets.. not to mention the guy behind
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 30/60 tricky spot vs. opp w/ a lot of history
He's bet/folding this river less than 12% of the time?
|
|
|