How many 85 year olds... - Page 2

Killua · #1 11-30-2007, 02:00 AM

On an open court, like a football field, probably over 100, you could jog to one end when you're a bit tired, and lie down for like 2 minutes to recoup.

The only real problem is when they attack in waves, if they have a good tactic I'm sure 100 could beat me. Like forming rows of ten and then coming towards me, I don't know if I could push them etc...

benza13 · #2 11-30-2007, 02:17 AM

[ QUOTE ]
less than the number of 5 year olds I could take

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, 85 yo's would be easier to take than 5 yo's for sure

Alobar · #3 11-30-2007, 02:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
less than the number of 5 year olds I could take

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, 85 yo's would be easier to take than 5 yo's for sure

[/ QUOTE ]

not even. They are stronger, and they also weigh 3x as much.

benza13 · #4 11-30-2007, 02:31 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
less than the number of 5 year olds I could take

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, 85 yo's would be easier to take than 5 yo's for sure

[/ QUOTE ]

not even. They are stronger, and they also weigh 3x as much.

[/ QUOTE ]

no stamina and they would break much easier due to osteoporosis and [censored]

ChipWrecked · #5 11-30-2007, 02:56 AM

A lot fewer than 5 year olds.

85 year old men have had a lot of time to learn dirty tricks.

kevin017 · #6 11-30-2007, 04:42 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
less than the number of 5 year olds I could take

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, 85 yo's would be easier to take than 5 yo's for sure

[/ QUOTE ]

not even. They are stronger, and they also weigh 3x as much.

[/ QUOTE ]

5 year olds are way faster and more resilient. i'm thinking i could take out 30 of either. but, i'm pretty confident i couldn't take more than 30 5 year olds, but i could see myself maybe being able to take more than 30 85 year olds if i carefully knock them out one by one. there wouldn't be the same inevitibility of being swarmed like there is with 5 year olds.

OrrLives · #7 11-30-2007, 08:20 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
less than the number of 5 year olds I could take

[/ QUOTE ]

no way, 85 yo's would be easier to take than 5 yo's for sure

[/ QUOTE ]

not even. They are stronger, and they also weigh 3x as much.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly. The extra weight and height factor is not being taken into account by enough posters. You can kick all the 5 years olds, but the older folks will require some upper body work. If they latch on they could do some damage.

321Mike · #8 11-30-2007, 08:33 AM

My grandfather is a 91 year old Maine potato farmer. He's gone downhill the last couple years, but 6 years ago I'd have taken even money on him in a fistfight against at least a third of the people on this forum.

mulebennett · #9 11-30-2007, 01:15 AM

150 at least

prohornblower · #10 12-01-2007, 10:28 PM

I think my answer lies somewhere between 100-300.

Pushing them over and tripping them would yield great results while expending little energy.

I think I'd be able to keep going until my fists went numb, or I passed out from hunger or thirst. The thought of this is quite disturbing.

I think if you make the age 100, I could take all of them. All of them on the planet, with little effort.

70 year olds would yield a much, much lower number. Maybe like 20. Chr*st, Jack Nicholson is 70, to put it in perspective. I don't think he goes down too easily.