|
|
#21
11-03-2007, 01:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
[ QUOTE ]
My ROI is 30% lower at the 27's. [/ QUOTE ] .7% instead of 1%? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 
|
|
#24
11-03-2007, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
I remember wanting to make this move last year and wondering the same thing. I found that judging by solid players stats who had moved up from the 16s for a decent sample all had mediocre stats at the 27s (myself included) and their hourly rates would have been the same, or even better in a lot of cases had they stayed at the 16s, with less variance. Having said that, if you work hard on your game and focus on your opponents ranges and game select when necessary there's no reason why you can't move up and be more successful.
|
|
#26
11-03-2007, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
[ QUOTE ]
Hey eurythmech. Would you mind if I watched you play some sngs on stars? What's your sn if you dont mind? [/ QUOTE ] No real need to watch me in particular, there are plenty of good regulars in the lowstake SnGs at Stars. Just open up a few random $16 that are running, see if anyone's seated at multible tables. Do a search for this player, does he play a lot of tables? If so, Sharkscope him. Good ROI? Just as good to watch as me [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#27
11-03-2007, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
I have 20% ROI at 16's after 456 $16's and -9.6% after 130 $27's.
I probably run hot at $16's and very bad at $27's. Sample sizes are very little tho. I think I stick with the $16's until I have feel more confident and my bankroll is better. $27's at weekend USA evenings might be a good idea yes.
|
|
#28
11-03-2007, 03:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
I've also run sick at the 16s (24 ROI) over 430 and -11 ROI over 200 at the 27s... small samples are pretty meaningless, but there's got to be something more to it then just running hot at 16s and running horribly at 27s lol. IMO I should be able to have like a 10 ROI at 27s...
|
|
#29
11-03-2007, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
[ QUOTE ]
I've also run sick at the 16s (24 ROI) over 430 and -11 ROI over 200 at the 27s... small samples are pretty meaningless, but there's got to be something more to it then just running hot at 16s and running horribly at 27s lol. IMO I should be able to have like a 10 ROI at 27s... [/ QUOTE ] Wow, those stats are almost identical as little as it means
|
|
#30
11-03-2007, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Difference between $16\'s and $27\'s
Fwiw I have a losing record at the 27s too.
Curse, anyone? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
